Saturday, October 24, 2026

Hey, MAGA! You're supporting WHAT now???

 


MAGA, you're supporting WHAT now? Seriously?

 It's a week before the 2026 midterm elections. And you're now supporting THIS?

 

Seriously?

 

You?

 

You're my friend. I like you. How could you? How?

 

Before we talk about what you are NOW supporting, let's talk about what you've supported in the past.

 

Ten years ago, you shocked us.

 

How could you vote for HIM?

 

1.) The stupidity.

 

He's an idiot. The part of your brain that believed that he is a business mastermind was blinded by bling. Admit that on this one you played his dupe, like that guy who thinks he can beat the Times Square sidewalk shell game.  

 

He inherited all that wealth from his father. If he had just plowed his inheritance into a conventional investment plan, he'd be richer today than he is now – sorry – richer than he was before he turned our White House into his crooked cash grab.

 

The bankruptcies. The businesses as rotten as a termite-chewed foundation. Trump university? Steaks? Water? Airlines? Casinos?

 

2.) The betrayal of America.

 

Is he a Russian asset? Doesn't matter. He acts like a Russian asset. Sabotaging American interests around the world. Betraying the Founding Fathers. Tearing down the White House.

 

3.) The indecency.

 

This is the big one for me. I know you. I've seen you do good things. How can someone like you embrace and actively support an adjudicated rapist? A con artist who ripped off countless contractors? Who humiliated naïve working class dreamers who emptied out their life savings for fake Trump University?

 

So, yeah. Ten years ago, your support for the stupidity, the betrayal of America, the indecency shocked us all.

 

But now this.

 

Child _ _ _ _.

 

That's how bad this is. I can't even type the word.

 

You

 

actively support

 

with your vote

 

with your donations

 

with your social media endorsements

 

child _ _ _ _.

 

Here's the facts.

 

When Amy was three years old, her biological parents divorced.

 

Her mother, Donna Arthur, remarried a man named Cledith Arthur. Cledith Arthur had already been accused of _ _ _ ing his own biological daughter. Donna married him anyway.

 

Donna and Cledith Arthur abused Donna's two children, Amy and her brother Philip Stearns.

 

The family moved frequently. At one point, they lived in a tent.

 

In 1978, when she was twelve years old, Amy and Philip were removed by the state from Donna and Cledith. Cledith was charged with _ _ _ ing Amy. Cledith posted bail. He then fled. He became a fugitive from justice. Donna stayed with Cledith until his death as a fugitive from justice in 2004.

 

Amy had little to no contact with her mother since the removal in 1978.

 

In October, 2026, MAGA candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, running against Amy Acton to be Ohio's next governor, published an ad featuring Donna Arthur.

 

In this ad, Donna Arthur looks haggard and demented. She rants that her daughter, Amy Acton, is a liar and mentally ill.

 

Donna says that Amy never lived in a tent. Donna says that Amy was not abused. Donna doesn't use the word _ _ _ _, but the ad suggests that Amy Acton falsely accused Donna's husband Cledith of child _ _ _ _.

 

Here's what's true.

 

Every detail of Amy Acton's childhood abuse is supported by facts.

 

Hey, MAGA, remember facts? Objective truths? Those things that you rejected? In favor of conspiracy theories, social media tribal groupthink, the slop your MAGA talk radio controllers dump into your feeding trough, and ravings from the cult leader you mindlessly worship?

 

Contemporaneous newspaper accounts, court records, and testimony from eyewitnesses, including Philip Stearns, support Amy Acton's bio, and refute MAGA's sick, child-_ _ _ _-supporting lies.

 

Yes, Cledith Arthur was charged with child _ _ _ _. Yes, his own biological daughter, as well as Amy, were his victims. Yes, campground employees report that Cledith Arthur lived in a tent at a campground and used that campground as his address. Yes, Donna and Cledith abused little Amy and little Philip. Yes, authorities had to remove the children from the abuse.

 

Yes. Yes. Yes. Facts, MAGA. Facts.

 

And there's more.

 

Donna Arthur has repeatedly been legally charged with abusing animals. She tortured kittens.

 

This is the slop you support, MAGA. Not just someone who, according to court documents, facilitated the _ _ _ _ of her own daughter. You support a kitten torturer.

 

Donna Arthur pleaded guilty to "Theft by Deception / False Impression." She was repeatedly charged with this crime.

 

This is what you support, MAGA. Not just the big, fat criminal in the White House. You support this nasty, child-_ _ _ _-facilitator, who served up her own daughter to the evil POS she married.

 

Is it wrong to associate you, MAGA voter, MAGA donator, MAGA endorser on social media, with child _ _ _ _?

 

Are you serious?

 

The Epstein Files coverup was not enough to get you to wash your hands of this filth forever?

 

Donald Trump and JD Vance both explicitly endorsed the ad alleging that Amy Acton lied about having been abused, about living in a tent, about being removed by the state from her demented mother and _ _ _ ist stepfather.  

 

Let me spell this out for you.

 

When an adult man _ _ _ _ s a child, he is in the stronger position. The child is in the weaker position. He has physical strength. The little girl lacks commensurate physical strength.

 

The _ _ _ ist also possesses greater social strength. The little girl might not even understand what's happening. The adult man may have groomed her. He may use threats as part of grooming. Some of the _ _ _ ists, for example, threaten to hurt the child's loved ones if the child speaks up.

 

Too many surrounding adults don't want to deal with child _ _ _ _. They close their eyes. They say, "Oh, the girl is making stuff up." What they really mean is, "If I confront this guy, he might hurt me. The girl can just endure it. She'll grow up and leave home soon enough and be okay."

 

How do I know that this is what happens? I'm a teacher. I've worked with girls to whom this happened. I know the barriers to belief and salvation that victims face.

 

One of those barriers is when people choose to side with the _ _ _ ist, rather than the child.

 

MAGA, if you continue to vote MAGA, to donate to MAGA, to endorse MAGA on social media, that's who you are. You are the person who is using their personal power to crush a victim of child _ _ _ _, and to protect _ _ _ ists.

 

Your guy, the leader of your movement, Donald J. Trump, your guy, the second-in-command of your movement, JD Vance, have actively, overtly, explicitly, called a victim of child _ _ _ _ a liar, thus facilitating child _ _ _ _. If no one believes the victim, if everyone believes the perpetrator, the child is stuck in the hell of _ _ _ _ _ _ abuse.

 

It's a binary choice. Either you are on team anti-child-_ _ _ _, or  you are on team pro-child _ _ _ _.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Bieganski the Blog exists to further explore the themes of the book Bieganski the Brute Polak Stereotype, Its Role in Polish-Jewish Relations and American Popular Culture.
These themes include the false and damaging stereotype of Poles as brutes who are uniquely hateful and responsible for atrocity, and this stereotype's use in distorting WW II history and all accounts of atrocity.
This blog welcomes comments from readers that address those themes. Off-topic and anti-Semitic posts are likely to be deleted.
Your comment is more likely to be posted if:
Your comment includes a real first and last name.
Your comment uses Standard English spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Your comment uses I-statements rather than You-statements.
Your comment states a position based on facts, rather than on ad hominem material.
Your comment includes readily verifiable factual material, rather than speculation that veers wildly away from established facts.
T'he full meaning of your comment is clear to the comment moderator the first time he or she glances over it.
You comment is less likely to be posted if:
You do not include a first and last name.
Your comment is not in Standard English, with enough errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar to make the comment's meaning difficult to discern.
Your comment includes ad hominem statements, or You-statements.
You have previously posted, or attempted to post, in an inappropriate manner.
You keep repeating the same things over and over and over again.