Bieganski the Blog
Saturday, August 1, 2026
Jakub Różalski – Warsaw Uprising
The Chronicle of Lerna by Michal Karski
The Trojan War has been over for many years and the glorious city of Troy is just a memory, but the anti-Trojan propagandists are still at work. There are people who fought with Agamemnon’s army who are intent on justifying Achaean aggression. The truth of what really happened at Troy is already being manipulated for political ends.
At his peaceful home overlooking the bay of Argos, the poet Linos of Lerna, who was with the Argives at Troy and served for a time as Agamemnon’s personal chronicler, decides to set the historical record straight.
Available at Amazon here
The excerpt, below, is interesting! Thank you to Michal for sharing it.
Here is an excerpt from the ending of Chapter Two. The poet Linos is talking to his helper, Glaukos:
"As for the story of the Trojan
campaign, you and I both know, my boy, that the spur for Agamemnon’s enterprise
was primarily the lust for conquest and booty and an opportunistic land-grab at
the expense of the isolated Trojans. Helen’s abduction may have been the
motivation for Menelaus himself, but it only served as a convenient pretext for
Agamemnon.
Of course, the entire thing is now being painted by Menelaus and his
acolytes as some kind of mythical quest of divine origin, with the abduction of
Helen coming to the fore and increasingly being proposed as the one and only
legitimate cause for the Achaeans to make war on the wealthy city of Troy with
its fertile lands and its world-famous horses.
But the Spartan propagandists
and spinners of Menelaus are also engaged in something quite sinister. They are
already doing their utmost to try to shift the blame for the war onto the
Trojans. The perpetrator is beginning to blame the victim. The glaring example
that springs immediately to mind is the expression ‘Trojan Horse’.
How so, sir?
Think about it, Glaukos. The famous
Trojan Horse. The wooden horse was constructed by the Achaeans and was left on
the Trojan shore. Should it not be called the Achaean Horse or the Argive Horse
or the Danaan Horse? Or perhaps the Horse of Odysseus, after the man who
thought of it, or the Horse of Epeius after the actual architect?
No, the
revisionists at the court of Menelaus have successfully labelled it a ‘Trojan
Horse’, supposedly on the grounds that it was built in Troyland of Trojan wood.
What they are actually doing, of course, is subtly and deliberately trying to
conflate victim and aggressor. Any surviving Trojans who hear the story of the
ruin and burning of Troy will recall not only the horror of the desperate
fighting and carnage and atrocities committed upon the civilians of Troy, not
to mention the total devastation and destruction of the city, but they will
also suffer the added indignity of having the engine of their destruction
labelled as ‘Trojan’.
And, judging by the frequency of the use of this phrase
by now – I had to remonstrate with that minstrel fellow for using it – I
wouldn’t be at all surprised if this expression becomes the generally accepted
shortcut in future ages.
I had never considered that, venerable
sir.
Thersites was one of those who
understood the value of propaganda quite early on. “In the long run, propaganda
can be more effective than a sword-thrust,” was one of his maxims. We may be
fighting a losing battle against the revisionists of Menelaus, but fight we
must, Glaukos. We owe it to the inhabitants of Troy, who may not have had a
perfect society, but who certainly did not start the war nor do they deserve
the kind of denigration which is being heaped upon them by the victors.
There
were certainly xenophobes among them, and far be it from me to defend the
indefensible, but on the whole, they were no more and no less xenophobic than
any other society of the region. Far be it from me to be an apologist for
injustice and I did, after all, take part in the campaign against them, because
we all believed they had transgressed against the gods by abducting Helen, and
I was one of the many among us who believed that much more should have been
done by way of diplomacy, but I am not biased either for them or against them.
I can understand that Menelaus might want to present some kind of justification
for his own and his brother’s actions, but aggression must be called out for
what it is and no amount of revision will disguise that and no amount of
myth-making can convince posterity that the Trojans were the architects of
their own downfall or somehow deserve to be collectively slandered, much less
deserved to be obliterated in the first place."
Thursday, July 30, 2026
Are Jews "Oppressors" ?
In response to my piece "I Stand with the Jews," a comment came in talking about "oppressors." The commenter did not specify what group he meant by "oppressors."
Thursday, July 23, 2026
I Stand with the Jews Part Two of Two Parts
"I Stand with the Jews"
What does that mean?
Second of two parts
A canopy of oaks and maples rose overhead. Green understory
surrounded me: pinxter azaleas and thorny Japanese barberry. Bluets – tiny
wildflowers – blossomed underfoot. Up ahead, Marc approached me with his
typically hale and hearty, "Hello, Danusha!"
I shoved my rosary in my pocket and removed my headphones. I had
been cheating. I should have been focusing, with the binoculars around my neck,
on the migrating spring warblers that make Garret Mountain famous among
birders. Instead I was listening to Gregorian chant and praying the rosary as I
hiked. "Hello, Marc," I said, as I migrated from internal
contemplation of the eternal to external society and the ingeniously plumaged
sprites zipping around us.
"Look at that color!" Marc exclaimed.
I pointed my binoculars in the direction Marc indicated. He had
spotted a purple finch.
"I can see," I said, "Why Roger Tory Peterson
called them 'a sparrow dipped in raspberry juice.'"
Marc is, by many estimates, the best birder in the state. Of
course we are all, in our own ways, the "best" birdwatcher in
compliance with our own needs and desires, but Marc racks up awesome numbers of
the species he sees annually.
Marc's surname harkens back to Chelm, a city in Poland once famous
among Jews as a site of folkloric fools. My favorite Chelm story: the local
wise men declared that if you drop a buttered slice of bread, it will always
fall on the buttered side. This conclusion reflects the pessimistic worldview
typical of both Jews and non-Jews in Eastern Europe. Of course, eventually,
someone dropped a buttered piece of bread and it fell buttered side up. The
wise men of Chelm debated this astounding event and determined that the slice
had been buttered on the wrong side. Chelm stories arose from a culture that
valued scholarship enough that it could spoof scholarly folly.
Mindful of Marc's identity as someone other than our state's best
birdwatcher, I wondered if I should say something.
I had told myself, if the opportunity arises, I will say
something.
Was this the moment, though, to say something?
I felt timid, but also determined. If we keep waiting for the
perfect moment, we never say anything.
"Marc," I ventured. "I want to say something about
something other than birds."
"Yes?" Marc said, turning his attention from the purple
finch to a streamlet that might be playing host to a Louisiana waterthrush.
"There's been a rise in antisemitism."
"You think?" Marc said, his voice rising, in an
atypical, for him, sarcastic comment.
"Yes, and I just want you to know that I'm not Jewish…"
said the woman who had been praying the rosary and listening to Gregorian
chant. "But I want to be an ally. I'm on your side."
I'm glad I said something. If the moment arises when Marc could use some support from someone like me, he knows I'm here.
Monday, July 13, 2026
I Stand with the Jews Part One of Two Parts
"I
Stand with the Jews"
What does that mean?
First of two parts
The other day, an
antisemitic comment came through my social media feed. I didn't want to debate
the poster. People who say abysmally stupid things do not deserve the respect
implied by debate, nor do they deserve the attention that debate generates. But
I did not want his comment to go unanswered. All I said was, "I stand with
the Jews."
"What does that
mean?" the antisemite challenged.
This essay offers my response to his question.
Friday, June 19, 2026
Pressure Movie Review. Yes we do need another D-Day Movie
Pressure
2026
Yes,
we do need another D-Day movie
I
walk a lot. I check NOAA's forecast five times before heading out. If there's a
ten percent chance of rain, I have a Gore-Tex slicker in my daypack. I'm always
over-prepared for weather. One day I was walking down Ratzer Road, a road I've
walked hundreds of times. I passed wide lawns and suburban McMansions, some of
them costing a million dollars. I felt carefree. That did not last.
Boom.
In the time it took me to type the word "boom," everything changed.
The sky turned black. Forty-foot evergreens swayed so drunkenly I feared they'd
lash me like the tail of a lunging tiger. Pelting hail obscured my vision. With
every step I pushed against a locked door – the wind was that determined to
prevent me from moving. I recognized that this is the kind of weather that
kills. I frantically sought a nook where I could take shelter in this, not my
neighborhood, and, again, that fast, it was all over. The sky was suddenly
dove-gray. The hail relaxed to a light drizzle. The Apocalypse was canceled.
My
best guess is that I was stuck in a dangerous phenomenon called a
"microburst." Microbursts damage structures, cause car accidents and
plane crashes, and they do kill. Ultimately, though, what it was, was weather.
In
Indiana, after a tornado, I heard of a grandfather trying to hold back his
grandson, to no avail. The tornado pulled the tyke out the window. In 2011, in
Paterson, NJ, I was evacuated during Hurricane Irene. The Passaic River was
coming up through the floorboards. Within hours the entire neighborhood, for a
mile around, was under water. In 2012, after Hurricane Sandy, for most of two
weeks, we had no electricity and substandard tap water. In 2021, thirty New
Jerseyans died during Hurricane Ida. One victim drowned on the very non-aquatic
Lackawanna Avenue, near a Best Buy and a Barnes and Noble. Two people tried to
rescue her, but these Good Samaritans had to themselves be rescued by fire
department crews. Her body was never found.
Weather.
We
humans have dominated much of nature. We have extended average lifespans,
conquered smallpox, and manipulated the landscape to our whim. But we are still
mere playthings in the hands of weather. A new film, Pressure, examines
the impact of weather on a history-making event: D-Day.
Perhaps
no human accomplishment supersedes D-Day as an expression of humanity's power.
D-Day was the largest seaborne invasion in history. On June 6, 1944, almost
160,000 Allied troops landed on Normandy's beaches. These included troops
from the United Kingdom, Canada, and twelve other Allied nations. Over 7,000
naval vessels and 12,000 aircraft participated. An estimated 100,000 French
resistance fighters coordinated, via coded messages, with overseas planners and
carried out crucial and meticulous preparatory operations behind enemy lines.
For example, the French derailed Nazi supply trains inside tunnels. Repairing a
train derailment inside a tunnel is much harder than doing so in an open field.
By the end of June, Allies had delivered 570,000 tons of supplies. By the end
of August, two million Allied troops were in France.
In spite of this display of human might, D-Day's planners were still subject to weather. The new film, Pressure, makes this vulnerability to weather abundantly clear. If the Allies had attempted D-Day on the wrong day, with the wrong weather, D-Day might have failed, and the attempt to defeat Nazi Germany would have gone very differently.






.jpeg)