The Pope at
War: The Secret History of Pius XII, Mussolini, and Hitler by David I. Kertzer
A magnificent
book addresses a controversial topic
The Pope at
War: The Secret History of Pius XII, Mussolini, and Hitler was published by Random House in June,
2022. It is 672 pages long, inclusive of black-and-white photographs, an
appendix listing archival sources, endnotes, a bibliography, and an index.
Author David I.
Kertzer (b. 1948), is Paul R. Dupee, Jr. University Professor Emeritus of
Social Science, Professor Emeritus of Anthropology and Italian Studies, and
Professor of International and Public Affairs at Brown University. Kertzer
received the 2015 Pulitzer Prize for his 2014 book, The Pope and Mussolini:
The Secret History of Pius XI and the Rise of Fascism in Europe.
Kertzer is the
son of Rabbi Morris Kertzer, to whom he dedicates this book. Rabbi Kertzer was
an Army chaplain during World War II; he led services on the Anzio beachhead.
The New York Times described him as "a leader in strengthening
relations between Jews and Christians." Rabbi Kertzer's books include What Is a Jew? and The Art of Being
a Jew.
The Pope at
War: The Secret History of Pius XII, Mussolini, and Hitler became a bestseller, and it has received
numerous accolades. Daniel Silva, an author of thriller novels, called The
Pope at War "The most important book ever written about the Catholic
Church and its conduct during World War II." Haaretz called the book
"A damning picture of a holy man who chose to remain silent about the mass
destruction of European Jewry." James Carroll, author of Constantine's
Sword: The Church and the Jews, reports that no one ever again need debate
the role or character of Pope Pius XII. "With Kertzer’s magnum opus, the
book on Pius XII is written, the dispute resolved, the case closed."
Kertzer and his
many colleagues whom he thanks in four-pages of acknowledgments have engaged in
massive amounts of research, including in newly released Vatican archives.
Kertzer reports on devastating material, including the mass murder of Jews and
Pius XII's baffling responses to those massacres. Kertzer reports the most disturbing of facts in a
dispassionate manner. The combination of Kertzer's thorough support for his
thesis and his perpetual emphasis on reporting objective facts without
emotional appeals, self-indulgent rants, or heart-tugging flourishes render his
conclusions unimpeachable. Kertzer argues that it is accurate to typify Pius
XII's response to Nazi crimes as silence. The pope faced many moments when
another leader would have raised a voice of protest against, for example, the
deportation of Jews to extermination camps. But Pius was silent.
For this
reader, even this superb book presented drawbacks. What makes for awesome
scholarship didn't, for this reader, make for page-turning reading. Indeed, it
would not be right to demand that a book that accomplishes all that this book
accomplishes be a riveting read. Kertzer's book, before I reached page 100,
convinced me that Pope Pius XII was the wrong man in the wrong job at the wrong
time. I still had hundreds of pages of forced march reading before reaching the
book's final pages.
Those hundreds
of pages followed a predictable pattern, a pattern that was both highly
disturbing and monotonous. Kertzer recreates diplomatic communications in
wartime Europe. Some higher-up in the Nazi, Italian Fascist, or Vatican
hierarchy, or a British, French, Polish, German or American diplomat, or a
priest in Poland or a rabbi in the US, sent a letter or telegram, or conveyed
an oral report, to someone else in the above chain. The recipient considered
the document or oral communication, passed it on to someone else, who passed it
on to someone else, and, eventually, Pius XII responded. His response was
almost always to refuse to say anything to address Nazi crimes. This pattern
repeats on page after page, for hundreds of pages.
Various factors
have been suggested as to why Pius XII was silent. Kertzer acknowledges that
Pius XII feared Communism, and that the Nazis attempted to sell Nazism to Pius
and to others as a bulwark against a worse enemy, the USSR.
Kertzer does
not detail why the leader of the Catholic Church would have reason to fear
Communism in the mid-twentieth century. In fact Communist and other
anticlerical regimes have a long history of mass killings of Catholics. Such
massacres go back at least as far as the French Revolution. The Revolution
didn't just decapitate nuns. An estimated 200,000 French people died in the War
in the Vendee, fought over the Revolution's forced dechristianization. Tens of
thousands died on both sides of the early-twentieth-century Cristero War in
Mexico. The dead included twenty-five canonized martyrs to their Catholic
faith. Bolsheviks killed thousands of clergy, mostly Orthodox Christians but
including some Catholics. During the 1936-39 Spanish Civil War, Republicans
killed an estimated seven thousand priests, monks, and nuns, often in brutal
ways, including through hideous acts of torture. None of this is addressed in
any detail in the book.
Even those of
us aware of these facts do not find in them an adequate excuse for Pius XII's
silence. As for the Nazis' claim that they were a bulwark against Communism and
its genocidal hostility to Christianity, the Nazis were themselves torturing
and murdering priests and planned the elimination of Christianity. Pius XII
received ample reports to be aware of that.
Another
argument meant to exculpate Pius XII, one cited in Kertzer's book, is that Pius
XII felt that his role was to make sure that the Catholic Church would
continue. Many assumed that the Nazis and their fascist allies in Italy would
soon control all of Western Europe. It was Pius XII's job, in his own view, to
maintain a detente with fascists in order to make sure that churches still
stood, mass was still said, and children could still attend Catholic school. None
of these were reliable options in Republican Spain or the USSR. Pius also
wanted to make sure that neither the Axis powers nor the Allies bombed sacred
sites in Rome or the Vatican.
Kertzer
repeatedly mentions Pius XII's fear that speaking out would cause retaliation.
The fear was that if Pius XII spoke out, Nazis might retaliate by increasing
their persecution of vulnerable persons under Nazi occupation. After Pope Pius
XI, Pius XII's immediate predecessor, issued the 1937 anti-Nazi encyclical Mit
brennender Sorge ("With Burning Concern"), Nazis increased
persecution – see here.
Another event cited to support the "If we speak out Nazis will increase
persecution" argument is the July 11, 1942, protest by Dutch bishops and
other Christians. These sent a letter to a Nazi general protesting against Nazi
abuse of Jews. Nazi retaliation followed. Previously, Dutch Jews who had
converted to Catholicism were exempt from deportation; Nazis now included them.
The question of
whether to take action against a powerful oppressor is a real one, under the
Nazis or under any other oppressive force. It was a question for, for example,
the Czech Jan Kubis and the Slovak Jozef Gabcik, the two men who, in 1942,
attacked Nazi occupier Reinhard Heydrich, the "Butcher of Prague." In
retaliation for this attack, Nazis wiped the entire Czech village of Lidice
from the map.
For this
reader, the fear of retaliation is not adequate to explain the silence of Pius
XII. Protests and resistance did not cause the Nazis to commit a genocide of
Jews or to send Lidice's children to be gassed in the Chelmno extermination
camp. Nazis committed atrocities without reference to resistance. As the
civilized world allowed Nazi Germany to get away with its genocidal agenda,
Nazi Germany escalated to the next step. Appeasement and silence, not protest,
were the Nazis' allies. People like Neville Chamberlain, not heroes like Gabcik
and Kubis, bear responsibility for facilitating Nazi crimes. When facing evil
like the Nazis, delaying confrontation merely raises the cost of inevitable
confrontation. Alternate historians argue that had the West confronted Hitler
militarily in 1938, in response to his demand for Czechoslovak territory,
Hitler could have been beaten quicker and at a lower cost. Rather than
confronting Hitler in 1938, the West appeased Hitler and handed over the small
nation of Czechoslovakia to him. Just eleven months later, Hitler invaded
Poland and began World War II in Europe. The cost in blood and treasure to
defeat him at that point was massive.
Another
possible explanation for Pius' silence was his nature. Pius XII was an ascetic,
that is a man who lived a life of self-discipline, hard work, and little sleep
or food. He began working for the Vatican in 1901. He lived almost his entire
life in Rome, except for the twelve years he spent in Germany as nuncio.
Perhaps his lack of experience in the world beyond the Vatican handicapped him
in dealing with intimidating fascist dictators. Some assessed Pius XII as too
timid to stand up to fascists. The British ambassador assessed Pius XII's
refusal to condemn the Nazi and Soviet invasions of Poland as evidence of
"pusillanimity." At the conclave to elect Pius XI's successor, in one
assessment, Italian cardinals faulted the future Pius XII "for his
weakness of character, for being too prone to bend to pressure." French cardinal
and curia member Eugene Tisserant assessed Pius XII as "too weak, too
easily intimidated." The Spanish ambassador said that Pius XII was
"completely devoid of will and character."
The one fact
that is abundantly clear is that Pius XII liked Germans and Germany a great
deal. Sister Pascalina, aka "La Popessa," a German nun, ran his
household. Pius XII took time out of his busy schedule to meet with German
visitors to the Vatican, including soldiers, chatting with them in his fluent
German, and telling them how much he liked their country. Germans and Poles
have fought each other for hundreds of years; the largest battle in Medieval
Europe, Grunwald, was between Germans and Poles. German culture is fertile
ground for negative stereotypes of Poles, including the belief that Poles are a
naturally chaotic inferior breed that benefits from German domination. Perhaps
this view influenced Pius XII.
Pius XII
trusted an Italian Monsignor, Angelo Dell'Acqua, as an advisor. Dell'Acqua
included antisemitic comments in his advice. Dell'Acqua also used racist
language to dismiss an account sent to Pius XII from Polish-born Andrey
Sheptytsky. Sheptytsky was the Orthodox Archbishop and Metropolitan of Galicia.
In 1942, Sheptytsky wrote to Pius XII as part of his efforts to help Jews.
Sheptytsky described Germans mass murdering Jews. In response to Sheptytsky's
account, Dell'Acqua wrote to Pius XII, "Orientals are not in fact an
exemplar of sincerity." Racists considered Slavs as Asians and racially
inferior to Western Europeans. In other words, Dell'Acqua accused Sheptytsky of
lying, and lying because of his "Oriental" race.
Kertzer
mentions Sheptytsky's letter, but does not name him, nor provide biographical
details. In fact Andrey Sheptytsky was an impressive man. At risk to his own
life, he "publicly protested the murder of Jews and denounced his own
congregants for participating in the violence," according to the Times
of Israel. Sheptytsky has been nominated to receive Yad Vashem's
"Righteous" recognition and he has also been nominated to be declared
a saint. Jaroslav Pelikan assesses Sheptytsky as "the most influential
figure ...in the entire history of the Ukrainian Church in the twentieth
century." It's important to note that such a significant Christian figure
in Ukraine resisted the Nazis, rescued Jews, and attempted, unsuccessfully, to
recruit help from the Vatican.
Many readers
are sure that they are not as baffled by Pius XII's silence as I am. They are
convinced that they understand Pius XII, and indeed the Catholic Church,
completely. Pius was an antisemite. The Catholic Church is antisemitic. The
Catholic Church provided the historical runway for Nazism. Indeed, Kertzer has
written another book, The Popes Against the Jews: The Vatican's Role in the
Rise of Modern Anti-Semitism, that makes that very argument.
The conclusions
I draw are different from those that Kertzer and many other readers draw. Why
is my reaction different? Let me explain. The other day I was chatting with a
lovely health care professional. "Betty" is a Jewish American woman
in her sixties. She has an advanced degree, she is published in peer-reviewed
journals, and she works at one of the top-rated hospitals in the world in one
of the wealthiest suburbs in the US. Betty mentioned to me that she recently
performed a pilgrimage to Holocaust-related sites in Germany and Poland. I
commiserated. I mentioned my own relatives' significant victimization at the
hands of the Nazis. Betty was visibly confused. "But you're
Catholic." She was unaware that Nazis had ever mistreated Catholics, and
she had no idea that Nazis had ever mistreated Slavs. Betty is not unique. I
have had similar encounters dozens of times.
Michael C.
Steinlauf, professor of Jewish history and son of Polish-Jewish Holocaust
survivors, wrote that Poles, "after the Jews and
the Gypsies [were] the most relentlessly tormented national group in Hitler's
Europe." Poland, according to one
estimate, lost the second-largest percentage of its population during Nazi
occupation; Belarus lost the largest. Before the September 1, 1939 blitzkrieg,
Hitler ordered, "I have placed my death-head formations in readiness – for
the present only in the East – with orders to them to send to death mercilessly
and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish derivation and
language. Only thus shall we gain the living space (Lebensraum) which we
need." Generalplan
Ost was a Nazi plan to kill off most Poles and a lesser portion of
other Eastern Europeans, save a remnant as slaves, and to take over Polish and
other Eastern European territory for Germans. Beginning in 1941, Nazis
murdered, usually by starvation, an estimated three million Soviet POWs. Before
the Nazi invasion of Poland, Reinhard Heydrich prepared the Sonderfahndungsbuch
Polen, a list of 61,000 Poles to be executed. In an initial
implementation of Generalplan Ost, Einsatzgruppen were ordered to
"decapitate" Polish society, usually through mass
shootings.
Auschwitz was
initially founded as a place to destroy Polish society. An estimated 140,000
non-Jewish Poles were sent to Auschwitz; about half died there. Non-Jewish
Poles were imprisoned in other camps, as well. For example, in Ravensbruck,
Polish women were used in Nazi medical experimentation. Nazis interned 1,700
Polish priests in Dachau; an estimated half died there. The skin of Polish
inmates was used to make various items; their fat was used to make soap; Poles
and Soviet POWs were the first to be gassed using Zyklon B.
Polish clergy
were among the first inmates at Auschwitz. Eventually there were 464 male
Catholic clergy in Auschwitz and thirty-five nuns. An estimated one fifth of
all Polish priests were murdered by Nazis. In Lodz, there was a concentration
camp for Polish children. Millions of Poles were enslaved by Nazis. Nazis
plundered and destroyed Polish churches, museums, and libraries, all with the
goal of eradicating Polish culture. Hundreds of villages were razed. Polish
priest Jozef Gociek was beaten to death in Auschwitz. His photo is here.
Polish nun Maria Klemensa Staszewska died of typhus in Auschwitz. Her photo is here.
Brother Anicet Koplinski died in Auschwitz; no one is sure of his cause of
death. His photo is here.
Nazis shot Father Piotr Sosnowski to death; his photo is here.
Both Polish priest Maximilian
Kolbe and Bernhard
Lichtenberg, a German Catholic priest, helped Jews, and both exhibited
extraordinary courage before their deaths in Auschwitz and en route to Dachau,
respectively. Nazis murdered 152 Jesuits, forty-three of them in concentration
camps. Fourteen-year-old Czeslawa Kwoka was one of over one hundred thousand
Poles ethnically cleansed from Zamosc, a region in Poland. The girl died in
Auschwitz; her photos is here.
During these ethnic cleansing operations, when separating children from
parents, Nazis used whips for crown control; see here.
Other Polish girls similarly ethnically cleansed and sent to a concentration
camp can be seen here.
Nazi Germany
began its genocidal assault on Poland on September 1, 1939. In accord with the
Ribbentrop - Molotov Pact, the USSR attacked Poland from the east on September
17, 1939. As Kertzer reports, "over the first three days" of the
invasion, "German forces would carry out seventy-two mass
executions." Victims were Polish "men, women, and children." Six
hundred more massacres would follow just in the next few weeks. This was in
addition, of course, to aerial bombings of civilians. Poland's ambassador asked
Pius XII to speak out. The answer was no.
"As German
forces moved through western Poland … hundreds of priests . Were arrested ..
more than half the priests in western Poland would end up in concentration
campus, where many would die, while seminaries, church schools, monasteries,
and convents" were closed. "Church charitable institutions were
closed, and outdoor shrines" were "dismantled." The Polish
ambassador requested, in person, that Pius XII bless Poland. Pius XII refused.
"At a time
of extreme agony" some Poles living in Rome requested "to gather
around their common Father." Pius XII refused. Soviet invaders colluded
with Nazis to "carve up" Poland. "Still the pope remained
silent." Cardinal Tisserant protested. "The soldiers of Adolf the
Apostate and those of the atheist State [the USSR] are uniting to destroy
Catholic Poland. Will the Holy See not protest?" No.
Cardinal August
Hlond, Primate of Poland, met with Pius XII. Hlond brought Poles with him to
report on conditions in their country. Pius XII, as described by Britain's
envoy, offered "no word of reprobation of either the German or the Russian
invasion of Poland." In 1940, Cardinal Hlond asked merely for permission
to address his fellow Poles via Vatican Radio. No. Nazi Germany was not
surprised by Pius XII's behavior. "Pope's refusal to take sides against
Germany," wrote Germany's ambassador "would be entirely in harmony
with assurances he has repeatedly conveyed to me."
Pius XII
learned in November, 1939, "that all Vatican efforts to send relief
supplies to German-occupied Poland were being rebuffed." A Vatican report
described how immediately Nazis had acted to suppress Catholicism in Poland. In
Poland, the report stated, there were "no sacraments, no preaching, no
religious instruction. Absolute destruction of the once flourishing Catholic
press. No seminaries. No convents." Also in November, 1939, Hitler
survived an assassination attempt. Pius XII sent Hitler "congratulations"
for his survival.
In November,
1940, Kazimierz Papee, the Polish ambassador to the Holy See, pleaded with Pius
XII. He pointed out that the pope's reception of Joachim von Ribbentrop in
March 1940 was interpreted as signaling papal approval of German crimes in
Poland. "Poles wondered why Vatican Radio had remained silent about the
German occupation of the country, and L'Osservatore Romano made no
mention at all of the German assault on Poland."
A year later,
in November, 1941, Father Pirro Scavizzi, an Italian military chaplain, visited
Pius XII. Scavizzi offered a gruesome account of Nazi crimes against Jews in
Ukraine. He also reported on Catholics in Poland. "Scavizzi delivered an
impassioned letter from a Polish priest. Describing the terrifying events
unfolding in Poland, the priest said that the Poles could not understand what
they termed the Vatican's 'crime of silence.' He begged the pope to make his
voice heard." Pius XII did not.
In January,
1943, Papee returned with instructions from the Polish government in exile to
impress upon Pius XII how important it would be for him to speak out. "In
Poland," Papee told Pius XII, "new events have taken place. Their
horrific character cannot be compared to anything known in history."
Pius XII told
Papee he was "hurt" by criticism. He had spoken out adequately, he
insisted.
Papee replied
that "Polish bishops had not found his words adequate … he had nowhere
mentioned the Nazis, nor what, specifically they were doing."
Pius XII
protested that a specific denunciation of the Nazis would be used by the Nazis
as a pretext to commit crimes against their victims.
Nazis need no
such pretext to commit crimes, Papee pointed out. Furthermore, the Poles had no
patience for such excuses from the Vatican.
"One
senior British foreign officer" urged British and French cardinals to
write directly to Pius XII "and point out what an unfortunate effect his
silence on the subject of Poland was having on Catholic opinion in our two
countries." The archbishop of Paris did write to the pope. This letter did
not change Pius XII's approach to Poland.
Ambassador
Kazimierz Papee would later remember that when he met with Pius XII for the
tenth time, in 1944, Pius was angry. "When he saw me as I entered the room
and stood at the door awaiting permission to approach, he raised both his arms
in a gesture of exasperation. 'I have listened again and again to your
representations about our unhappy children in Poland,' he said. 'Must I be
given the same story yet again?'"
Perhaps the
reader of this review is feeling similar exasperation. Why does this review of
a book not focused on Poland emphasize the fate of Poles so much? Here's why.
Poles were and still are majority Catholic. Some insist that Kertzer's book and
others like it prove that Pius XII's behavior during World War II is easily
explained. Pius XII behaved as he did because he was antisemitic. As these
examples show, in his public statements, Pius XII took the same approach toward
atrocities committed against Catholic Poles, indeed, toward atrocities
committed against Catholic priests like himself, as he did towards atrocities
committed against Jews.
Nazis murdered
approximately two thirds of Europe's Jews. Nazis murdered approximately ten
percent of the non-Jewish Polish population. In other words, Polish Catholics
suffered a far lower percentage of deaths than did Jews. But Polish Catholics
were murdered in the same way as Jews – through mass shootings carried out by
Einsatzgruppen, through beatings, torture, gassing, starvation, subjects of
sadistic medical experimentation, and as slaves who were worked to death. This
implementation of Generalplan Ost began in 1939, before the 1942 Wansee
Conference. In his public statements, Pius XII adopted the same approach,
silence, toward suffering by both groups. To this reader, that fact weakens the
thesis that Pius XII behaved as he did because he was inspired by antisemitism.
Another explanation must be offered for this behavior. Kertzer's book did not
present, to this reader, an adequate explanation. I simply don't understand
Pius XII.
Some voices,
hostile to Christianity, cite Nazism as proof that Christianity is a source of
evil. These voices conflate Nazism with Christianity. Those taking this
position typically choose to downplay Nazism's crimes against Poles and Poland.
Poland is famously a Catholic country. To acknowledge Nazi crimes against
Catholic Poles weakens the attempt to conflate Nazism with Christianity. In
fact, though, the long term Nazi goal was to eliminate
Christianity.
The project of
conflating Christianity with Nazism is undermined when one considers the
hideous atrocities Nazis committed against Catholic Poles. Eliminating from
consideration or at least downplaying Nazi persecution of Christians is exactly
what some do. Consider the above quoted James Carroll. Carroll (b. 1943) is a
former priest. In 2001, Carroll published Constantine's Sword: The Church
and the Jews. The book won many awards. It condemns Catholic antisemitism,
and indeed antisemitism is worthy of condemnation. But the book does something
else. Carroll's history of Catholic antisemitism opens at Auschwitz. Carroll
announces that this Nazi concentration camp in what was once Nazi-occupied
Poland is "central" to his history of Catholic antisemitism.
"Throughout the telling of this story," Carroll will
"remain" at Auschwitz. Carroll falsifies history to make his position
seem reasonable. He says that Polish Catholics imagine that they suffered under
Nazis – not that Poles suffered under Nazis, but that Poles imagine that they
suffered under Nazis. Carroll suggests to his reader that only one hundred
fifty Polish Catholics died at Auschwitz.
In 2001, in a
prize-winning, bestselling book, an author purporting to offer an accurate
history of Catholic antisemitism had to erase Nazi genocidal policies against
and behavior toward Catholic Poles in order to render his thesis plausible.
Twenty years later, readers had to distort history to make The Pope at War say
something that it doesn't, actually, say. And so, blind to the images of Father
Piotr Sosnowski or other Polish Catholics murdered by Nazis, Haaretz can
characterize the book as "A damning picture of a holy man who chose to
remain silent about the mass destruction of European Jewry." Pius XII
didn't remain silent just about "the mass destruction of European
Jewry." He remained silent about much else.
There's a
detail Kertzer doesn't mention. Kertzer's mentioning of this difficult fact
would help us to understand Pius XII, but mentioning this fact would weaken the
thesis that Pius XII's "silence" was his alone, and that, as such,
his "silence" uniquely implicates the Catholic Church.
In fact Pius
XII was not alone. Many were silent during the Holocaust. Imaginary Witness:
Hollywood and the Holocaust is a 2004 documentary. My review of it is here. As film
historian Neal Gabler argues in his book An Empire of Their Own: How the
Jews Invented Hollywood, Hollywood's moguls were often, though not always,
Eastern European Jews. Even they were relatively quiet in criticism of Nazi
Germany. Ben Urwand's 2013 Harvard University Press book The Collaboration:
Hollywood's Pact with Hitler argues that Hollywood produced material that
advanced the Nazi cause. In 2005 Cambridge University Press published Buried
by the Times The Holocaust and America's Most Important Newspaper. That
book points out that while America's newspaper of record, the New York
Times, did cover the Holocaust, it did so in muted terms that misled
readers. In June, 1983, Lucy S. Dawidowicz published, in Commentary magazine,
"Indicting American Jews."
That article was followed by a flood of letters debating
whether American Jews did enough while the Holocaust was happening. The same
theme is visited in Haskel Lookstein's 1985 Were We Our Brother's Keepers?
The Public Response of American Jews to the Holocaust and Rafael Medoff's
1986 The Deafening Silence: American Jewish Leaders and the Holocaust.
Elie Wiesel, in his 1978 work "A Plea for the Survivors," wrote,
"While Mordecai Anielewicz and his comrades fought their lonely battle in
the blazing ghetto under siege, while Arthur Zygelbaum committed suicide in
London to protest the complacency of the free world, a large New York synagogue
invited its members to a banquet featuring a well-known comedian." Wiesel
bemoaned silence in the face of the Holocaust. In September, 2022, the Forward
summarized the message of a then-new Ken Burns documentary on the
Holocaust. The article is titled, "Even American Jews ignored the
Holocaust: New Ken Burns PBS series shows divisions in American Jewish
community’s response to Hitler."
American
Catholics, according to analyses of Catholic publications in the US published
during Hitler's rise, did not, on the whole, perform better in response to Nazi
persecution of Jews or even to Nazi persecution of fellow Catholics; see for
example here and here. Their
performance improved after Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor . Catholics made up
an estimated one third of Americans serving in uniform, though their percentage
of the US population was only about one fifth. Catholic chaplains during WW II
were especially heroic.
Historian Filip
Mazurczak alleges,
"Allied leaders such as Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill did
absolutely nothing to aid European Jews, although they do not have the same
stigma." That is, there is no cottage industry alleging that the West's
failure to respond to the Holocaust quickly and definitively reflects badly on
democracy. On the other hand, Pius XII's silence is used as proof that the
entire Catholic Church is beyond redemption.
In his blurb,
thriller author Daniel Silva commented that The Pope at War is "The
most important book ever written about the Catholic Church and its conduct
during World War II." Note Silva's language. "The Catholic
Church." "Its conduct." Is Pius XII the alpha and omega of
"the Catholic Church"? Is Pius XII's "conduct" the
"conduct" of the Catholic Church? Apparently not.
Those who
condemn Pius XII praise his immediate predecessor, Pius XI, who, in the context
of condemning Nazism, announced, "We are Semites." Pius XI was
pointing out that Christians descend from the same spiritual tree as Jews. Mussolini
feared Pius XI. Kertzer writes, "Pius XI's opposition to the anti-Jewish
'racial' laws threatened not only to weaken public support for the antisemitic
campaign but also to diminish public enthusiasm" for Mussolini himself. Some
thought that Mussolini had "found a way to hasten the pope to his
tomb." In other words, Mussolini feared Pius XI so much that some assumed
that Mussolini had him killed.
British
Minister to the Holy See, Francis D'arcy Osborne, contrasted Pius XI and Pius
XII. Pius XI "'fearlessly pronounced the moral verdict of Christian
civilization' against Nazi worship of the state." Pius XII, Osborne said,
"tailored his words 'to the exigencies of an anxious neutrality.'" The
French ambassador saw Pius XI as "a robust mountaineer from Milan"
and Pius XII as "a more passive Roman bourgeois." That one pope
actively resisted Nazism and that his immediate successor engaged in inadequate
resistance suggests the problem was more the man than the institution.
Yes, there was
too much antisemitism in the Catholic Church; see the American radio priest,
Charles Coughlin, for one powerful example. Less famous is Coughlin's
contemporary, Father John LaFarge, SJ. LaFarge, a white man, ministered to
blacks for fifteen years. He served as editor and writer for America, the
Jesuit magazine, for thirty-seven years, leading America in an
anti-racist and philo-semitic direction. Pius XI tapped LaFarge to write Humani
generis unitas ("On The Unity of the Human Race") an encyclical
opposing racism and antisemitism. Pius XII suppressed this encyclical. Leadership
matters and a wartime Vatican under Pius XI would have been a very different
Vatican, informed observers agree.
According to
the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, "one of the first coordinated
responses to state-sanctioned persecution of German Jews" was produced by
American Catholic clergy. In response to the November 9, 1938 Kristallnacht
pogrom, the Catholic University of America broadcast, via radio, a protest
against the violence against Jews. "The broadcast brought together
bishops, priests, and a Catholic layman from different parts of the country to
publicly denounce Nazi cruelty and to affirm Catholic support for Jewish
communities."
"Silence"
is a word applied to Pope Pius XII. There's a great deal of "silence"
when it comes to World War II. You can get an Amazon copy of The Pope at War
for six bucks. I can't find reasonably priced copies of The Jesuits and
the Third Reich anywhere. There are over a thousand Amazon reviews for The
Pope at War. For The Jesuits and the Third Reich, I can't find any
Amazon reviews. Luckily, First Things reviewed the first edition of this
book in November, 1990. The book's author, Vincent A. Lapomarda, SJ, attributes
the "silence" about institutional Catholic resistance to Nazism at
least partially to Stalinism. Catholics behind the Iron Curtain were actively
silenced, and also defamed, by Communist authorities. In Edward Krause's First
Things review
of The Jesuits and the Third Reich, Krause describes not just
individual, but institutional Catholic resistance to Nazism.
"Fathers
Pierre Chaillet and Henri de Lubac … edited and wrote for Temoinage Chretien,
which in 1942 had a circulation of 50,000. They repeatedly insisted that the
persecution of Jews was inseparably an attack on Christianity and in any case
intolerable … Cardinals Saliege of Toulouse and Gerlier of Lyons denounced the
regime’s anti-Semitic laws in pastoral letters and called upon the people to
resist … They helped inspire a joint protest written by Cardinal Suhard of
Paris and signed by all the bishops of France … 'We are profoundly shocked by
the mass arrests and the inhumane treatment meted out to Jews. In the name of
humanity and of Christian principle, we resolutely condemn this violation of
the inalienable rights of man' … In a pastoral letter, the primate of France
instructed French Catholics to refuse to surrender Jews to the authorities and
to hide or shelter them when possible. Priests, nuns, and laity were already
engaged in a massive rescue effort that saved tens of thousands of Jewish
lives."
Of course there
was individual, as well as institutional, Catholic resistance. Silva would not
equate "the Catholic Church" and "its conduct" with, say,
the "conduct" of the Ulma family. Jozef Ulma, a Polish Catholic
peasant, underlined in his Bible lines from the Good Samaritan parable. He and
his wife Wiktoria risked their lives to save Jews. Nazis murdered Jozef and
Wiktoria, their six children, and one child Wiktoria carried in her womb. Zofia
Kossak-Szczucka and Wladyslaw Bartoszewski, both Polish and Catholic, both
survivors of Auschwitz, co-founded Zegota, the only government-supported
organization in Nazi-occupied Europe whose sole purpose was to aid Jews.
I'll mention
one more quibble with Kertzer's otherwise excellent book. Nazis cited Catholic
precedent to Catholics. That is, Nazis reminded Catholics that popes ruling
over Papal States had relegated resident Jews to ghettos. Nazis reminded
Catholics of this in order to justify Nazi actions. The argument was that Nazis
confining Jews to ghettos was not such a bad thing. Kertzer does not offer
clarifying commentary on this diabolical Nazi mind game. He should. Of course
the Papal States' ghettoization of Jews deserves condemnation. But the Nazi
suggestion that the Papal States' policy sanitizes Nazi policies is obscene
propaganda. Papal bull Sicut Judaeis, issued by Pope Calixtus, forbade
violence against Jews, taking property from Jews, disturbing Jewish festivals,
forcing conversion on Jews, or violating Jewish cemeteries. Violators could be
excommunicated. Though issued c. 1120, its roots go back to Pope Gregory of the
sixth century. Subsequent popes reaffirmed Sicut Judaeis. The Papal
States' restriction of Jews to ghettos began in 1555 and ended three hundred
years later. Enforcement fluctuated depending on the attitude of the current
pope. Nazi ghettos were transit sites to extermination camps. The two are not
comparable and one does not "descend" from the other.
Nazism was
rooted in Herder's nationalism, the nineteenth-century fad for Neo-Paganism,
typified by the Grimms and Richard Wagner, scientific racism, and social
Darwinism. Herder, the Grimms, Wagner, and Darwin were not Nazis and they would
be horrified had they lived to see how their ideas were twisted by evil people.
Nazis voiced dedication to animals rights and Hitler was a vegetarian. Even
good or neutral ideas can be perverted by evil. Nazis didn't defer to
Catholicism to justify their behavior, they cited the above trends. See, for
example, Himmler's speeches delivered in Nazi-occupied Poznan. Himmler praised
the wonders of nature. Appreciation for the wonders of nature is a beneficent
thing. But to Himmler, nature demanded that he mass murder lesser life forms,
i.e. Jews and Slavs. Nazis used the same scientific racist arguments to support
the mass murder of handicapped Germans, as well as the mass murder of Jews.
Himmler said,
"Everything
that we do must be justifiable vis-Ã -vis the clan, our ancestors. If we do not
secure this moral foundation which is the deepest and best because the most
natural, we will not be able to overcome Christianity on this plane and create
the Germanic Reich which will be a blessing for the earth … We must be honest,
decent, loyal, and comradely to members of our own blood and nobody else. What
happens to a Russian and a Czech does not interest me in the least … Whether
nations live in prosperity or starve to death interests me only in so far as we
need them as slaves for our culture … Whether ten thousand Russian females fall
down from exhaustion while digging an anti-tank ditch interests me only in so
far as the anti-tank ditch for Germany is finished."
Hitler didn't
carry a Bible; he kept with him, rather, Richard Wagner's original scores.
These scores were lost in the Hitler Bunker. Hitler said that his
"Bible" was Madison Grant's scientific racist book The Passing of
the Great Race. That book called explicitly for the "elimination of
those who are weak or unfit." The taboo around mentioning social
Darwinism's influence on Nazism is great. Historian Richard Weikart is persona
non grata to many in academia. I have been burned for citing his works. Titles like
From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics and Racism in Germany
are accurate but to many academics utterly unspeakable. One must be
"silent" on how Darwinism, Neo Paganism, and atheism were distorted
to justify Nazi mass murder.
Danusha V. Goska is
the author of God through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery
