Thursday, August 31, 2023

Bieganski Lives: Tomasz Kamusella: "Rapacious Anti-Semitism Is the Foundation of the Polish Nation"

 


Tomasz Kamusella's academic biography is here. From that biography, "I was born in Upper Silesia, at that time in communist Poland. I received education at universities in the Czech Republic, Poland and South Africa. I did postdoctoral research at universities and institutes in Austria, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the US. I worked in Poland and Trinity College Dublin, before moving to St Andrews in 2011 … I am an interdisciplinary historian of modern central and eastern Europe, with a focus on language politics and nationalism."
 
In July, 2023, Kamusella released a paper entitled "Anti-Semitism: The Foundation of the Polish Nation." Quotes, below, are from that publication. You can read the entire paper here.

 

The paper is undisciplined. It does not meet academic standards. It does not advance a single thesis statement and support that statement with facts. The author jumps from asserting that "rapacious anti-Semitism" is the foundation of the Polish nation to condemnation of the szlachta's exploitation of serfs, and condemnation of all of Christianity.

 

In short, the article is a Gish gallop. A Gish gallop is logical fallacy. Here's the Wikipedia definition of a Gish gallop: "The Gish gallop is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm their opponent by providing an excessive number of arguments with no regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments. Gish galloping prioritizes the quantity of the galloper's arguments at the expense of their quality."

 

Kamusella's paper is a Gish gallop.

 

But here's the thing – he's denigrating Poland and Christianity. So his paper offers up the flavor of hate that academia wants. That is, of course, Bieganski: The Brute Polak Stereotype.

 

Thank you to Paul Kujawsky for sending this in.

 

The first two paragraphs of Kamusella's paper:

 

At the turn of the 20th century, framers of the Polish national ideology and leaders of the Polish national movement adopted antisemitism for building a Polish nation from the two enemy ethnic groups, namely, the Polish-Lithuanian noble gentry and ‘their’ Catholic and Slavophone serfs, or forced laborers. The Polish national idea excluded Jews, but its supporters had no qualms at grabbing Jewish property and cultural achievements, whenever possible and useful for the nation-building project and for individual members of such a Polish nation under construction.

 

With time, this rapacious antisemitism was written out, and even whitewashed, from the Polish national master narrative taught at Polish schools. Also, thanks to the partial incorporation of the competing ethnoconfessional and socialist projects of a Polish nation, the former being vaguely civic in its character, while the latter allowing membership through conversion to Catholicism. This process of forgetting about antisemitic atrocities has been helped by the ‘vanishing’ of Poland’s Jews, first in the Holocaust and subsequently in the country’s communist-period ethnic cleansing of Holocaust survivors. Yet, with the authoritarian turn in Polish politics after 2015, antisemitism is back in political practice and programs. Notwithstanding the absence of Jews as a visible community, antisemitism – quite frighteningly – still attracts votes at the ballot box.

10 comments:

  1. I have checked out his publications on the Polish Wikipedia site:

    Warszawa wie lepiej – Ślązaków nie ma. O dyskryminacji i języku śląskim [Warsaw Knows Better – The Silesians Don’t Exist: On Discrimination and the Silesian Language]

    Ślōnsko godka / The Silesian Language

    Uwag kilka o dyskryminacji Ślązaków i Niemców górnośląskich w postkomunistycznej Polsce
    (some remarks about the discrimination of Silesians and Upper Silesian Germans in Postcommunist Poland) etc.

    My guess-this guy does not consider himself Polish but member of the (thank God, marginal) "Silesian nation"supressed by Polish nationalist. Btw, Silesian is a Polish dialect. We recur to it in order to understand the development of the Polish language.

    He attacks Christianity? Of course he does-he attacks a pillar of Polish identity. He claims that after 2015 (what happend than...hmmm.....oh yeah! the big illegal migrant invitation by Germany) Poland "took a turn towards antisemitism without Jews"? Where? I've read all party programs and nowhere I could find anything that could even be understood as talking about Jews.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for sharing that insight with us!

      Delete
  2. I do not consider Kamusella's canned diatribe worthy of even being dignified by calling it a "Gish gallop".

    BTW, I knew Dr. Duane Gish (of the pejorative-termed "Gish gallop") and have studied many of his books. I am amused at the grudge still held by his debate opponents, moreover for so long after Gish's death. I guess he stepped on some toes.

    Fact is, Gish was a careful scholar and was commonly regarded as a fearsome debater. Please do not compare him with an attention-seeking Polonophobe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Józef Piłsudski accepted about 500,000 Jewish refugees from Soviet Russia and gave them full citizen rights. The Polish antisemitism.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Adam Mickiewicz was not Jewish, his mother had Tatar roots. https://forum.gazeta.pl/forum/w,12217,12116517,12116517,Mzulamanskie_pochodzenie_Mickiewicza.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. The article has not been peer reviewed, read only by Konstany Gebert.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jan Brzechwa's father was protestant, Jan had no cultural connection with Jewish culture. Julian Tuwim published this poem, part of which may be considered antisemitic. https://literatura.wywrota.pl/wiersz-klasyka/38309-julian-tuwim-zydzi.html Tuwim considered himself to be "nobody’s". Tuwim is forgotten by Jews. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/culture/why-is-the-great-poet-tuwim-beloved-by-poles-yet-forgotten-by-jews-612004

    ReplyDelete
  7. An English language text about Tuwim, quotes a phrase of the poem. https://culture.pl/en/article/julian-tuwim-the-quirks-and-dark-secrets-of-a-polish-jewish-poet

    ReplyDelete
  8. Let us look closely at this. Kamusella waxes eloquent:

    "Yet, with the authoritarian turn in Polish politics after 2015, antisemitism is back in political practice and programs. Notwithstanding the absence of Jews as a visible community, antisemitism – quite frighteningly – still attracts votes at the ballot box."

    It is transparent. Kamusella is demonizing PiS as an authoritarian and antisemitic party. Same old anti-PiS narrative. Elections are coming up in Poland in October, and it is politics as usual.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Off topic perhaps - (and Danusha is probably aware of this news item) - but here's a bit of a good news story from the Vatican - Pope Francis may have come out with the odd controversial comment now and again, but this is definitely to his credit:

    https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2023-09/pope-francis-archbishop-pena-parra-letter-ulma-family.html


    ReplyDelete

Bieganski the Blog exists to further explore the themes of the book Bieganski the Brute Polak Stereotype, Its Role in Polish-Jewish Relations and American Popular Culture.
These themes include the false and damaging stereotype of Poles as brutes who are uniquely hateful and responsible for atrocity, and this stereotype's use in distorting WW II history and all accounts of atrocity.
This blog welcomes comments from readers that address those themes. Off-topic and anti-Semitic posts are likely to be deleted.
Your comment is more likely to be posted if:
Your comment includes a real first and last name.
Your comment uses Standard English spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Your comment uses I-statements rather than You-statements.
Your comment states a position based on facts, rather than on ad hominem material.
Your comment includes readily verifiable factual material, rather than speculation that veers wildly away from established facts.
T'he full meaning of your comment is clear to the comment moderator the first time he or she glances over it.
You comment is less likely to be posted if:
You do not include a first and last name.
Your comment is not in Standard English, with enough errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar to make the comment's meaning difficult to discern.
Your comment includes ad hominem statements, or You-statements.
You have previously posted, or attempted to post, in an inappropriate manner.
You keep repeating the same things over and over and over again.