Darwinian
Racism: How Darwinism Influenced Hitler, Nazism and White Nationalism
Richard Weikart's New Book Cuts Through
Political Manipulation of History
Suffering is a commodity. Two recent
events demonstrated this. On March 27, 2022, Will Smith slapped Chris Rock at
the Academy Awards. Many prominent African Americans, including Kareem
Abdul-Jabbar and Wanda
Sykes, condemned Smith's choice to resort to violence. Race hustlers,
though, depicted Will Smith as a victim of white supremacy. The
Guardian ran a piece calling reaction to Will Smith an example of
"downright racist … anti-blackness … inequality in plain sight."
"Race scholar" and Loyola Marymount University Professor Maia
Niguel Hoskin wrote that the slap "is about … White supremacist
culture designed to police the behavior of Blacks." Others focused on Jada
Pinkett Smith as a victim. "How a black woman’s hair grows out of her head
has been a constant battle in this country … while at the same time celebrating
white women for fitting your styles … Humiliating a black woman fighting for
equality is not a ha-ha moment. Making fun of a black woman a week after we saw
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s ambush" proves that "racism always finds a
way," wrote columnist Jeneé
Osterheldt.
A similar process of victim-mongering
occurred after Ketanji Brown Jackson was nominated for the Supreme Court. My
Facebook page was flooded with memes depicting Jackson as a helpless Little
Match Girl facing off against big, scary, white male dragons.
In fact, of course, Smith is worth an
estimated $350 million. He is one of the most profitable and popular film stars
who has ever lived. Jackson is the child of two professionals. She attended
Harvard and married surgeon Patrick Jackson, a Boston Brahmin and descendant of
a Continental Congress delegate and also a relative of Oliver Wendell Holmes
and former House Speaker Paul Ryan. She is a millionaire. White male Joe Biden
guaranteed her elevation by vowing, in a political promise to help him win an
election, to nominate only black women to the SCOTUS. Ilya Shapiro, a white man,
tweeted that Sri Srinavasan, an Indian immigrant, was the best qualified person
to be the next SCOTUS nominee. Shapiro was suspended from his job for this
tweet. Neither alleged "white male privilege" nor the first amendment
guarantee of free speech protected Shapiro from workplace retaliation for
expressing his opinion. Senate questions for Jackson were brief and mild
compared to the trials-by-fire endured by conservative nominees Clarence
Thomas, Robert Bork, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.
Slavery, Jim Crow, and white supremacy
are all too real and unspeakably evil. But rushing to attribute criticism of
Will Smith or the Senate questioning of Ketanji Brown Jackson to past evils is
not warranted by the facts. People made those connections because they
commodify suffering to gain political ends. In this approach, suffering belongs
exclusively to African Americans. Race hustlers are currently depicting war-ravaged
Ukrainians as enjoying white privilege, as Joy
Reid did in her
March 7, 2022 broadcast.
Evil, like suffering, is also
commodified. Powerbrokers rush to monopolize the evil Nazis committed to serve
their own narrative ends. This commodification and monopolizing of evil
interferes with our desire to understand.
Americans have been struggling for
ninety years in their effort to tell the Nazi story accurately. This effort is
recorded, inter alia, in Peter Novick's 2000 book, The
Holocaust in American Life, Tom Segev's
The
Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, the This American
Life episode "Before It Had
a Name" and the documentary "Imaginary
Witness: Hollywood and the Holocaust." It's hard to believe now, but
there was a time when Hollywood moguls were fearful of making accurate films addressing
Nazism. There was a time when Holocaust survivors and those who recorded their
stories, both in the US and in Israel, were ignored and silenced. In the Soviet
Bloc, the unique victimization of Jews under Nazism was suppressed to near
invisibility. There was a time, even after the publication of Mein Kampf,
when mainstream American and British magazines focused on the
interior decorating of Hitler's homes. In these articles, Hitler was
referred to as "charming."