Source |
I have voted for both Republicans and Democrats for president. That's one way of saying that I do not have a tribe. Rather, what I have is ethics, ethics inspired by Jesus Christ. I really do ask myself, multiple times a day, "What would Jesus do?" I have yet to kill anyone in a road rage incident not because of my own self-control, but because of WWJD.
Ethics transcend tribal boundaries. I
used to be active in gay rights. I lived in Bloomington, Indiana, where some
local people were using the Bible as justification for writing to the local
paper to recommend stoning gay people to death. I met a woman who had been
dragged from a car because she was a lesbian. I met a young man, David Horne,
who attempted suicide because he was a gay Christian.
My Good-Samaritan-inspired ethics say:
people should not be tortured because they are gay. People should not kill
themselves because they are gay. People should not be stoned to death because
they are gay. Christianity should not be maligned as a murderer of gay people.
So I became active in gay rights.
In more recent years, I have opposed
extremism like what happened at WiSpa, where a male sex offender demanded and
received the right to be naked in the women's section of a spa. I oppose
medicine speaking of "pregnant people" instead of "pregnant
women" and "human milk" instead of "breast milk," etc.
I oppose the firing of Peter Vlaming, a beloved, veteran teacher, for referring
to a female student as "she." She wanted to be called "he."
When I was active supporting gay rights,
my comrades were mostly left-wing. In opposition to extremism, my comrades are
mostly right-wing. Again, ethics transcend tribal boundaries.
Dave Chappelle is an American comedian. His
fans worship him. Cults of personality are always a bad sign. Both of Chappelle's
parents were college professors. He grew up rubbing elbows with celebrities and
he attended a prestigious arts high school. He hails from comfortable Silver
Springs, Maryland, a DC suburb, and Yellow Springs, Ohio, a university town. In
spite of his privileged biography, Chappelle's career is built on exploitation
of the race card. Chappelle's comedy depicts an America where all whites are
racist haters and all blacks are helpless victims. Chappelle's net worth is
estimated at $50 million.
Chappelle's home state of Ohio is a
national center of "deaths of despair," often of poor and working
class whites. "Drug overdoses, suicide and alcohol-related liver disease
robbed Ohioans of 1.9 million years of life over the last decade … From 2010
through 2019 … the number of people dying each year increased 89%,"
reports the Canton Repository.
The drug overdose death rate for whites in Ohio is "37.8 deaths per
100,000 population," according to the
Ohio department of health. That's the
sixth highest rate nationwide. I have listened to a couple of Chappelle
specials and watched a couple episodes of his TV program and I've never heard
him talk about the deadly crisis afflicting his home state. Mention of the
suffering of white people might vitiate his insistence that only black people
suffer in America, and it would undermine the points he earns by depicting
himself as a brave warrior against intransigent American white supremacy.
Dave Chappelle, in addition to maligning
whites and infantilizing blacks, makes fun of gay, lesbian, and transgender
people. For this, conservatives embrace and elevate Chappelle. They are so
grateful to him. Chappelle is considered edgy and powerful, in no small part
simply because he is black, and many conservatives love it that an edgy and
powerful black man bashes GLBT people. Many conservatives know that they, who
are often white and not considered edgy and powerful, would be harshly
condemned for saying what Chappelle says.
I find this spectacle really sad.
Chappelle, by mocking GLBT people, is not striking any blow against extremism.
He's just hurting vulnerable people.
Chappelle opened his most recent, and
final, Netflix comedy special, "The Closer," with an anti-Semitic
joke:
"In my movie idea, we find out that
space aliens are originally from earth — that they're from an ancient
civilization that achieved interstellar travel and left the earth thousands of
years ago … Some other planet they go to, and things go terrible for them on
the other planet, so they come back to earth, [and] decide that they want to
claim the earth for their very own. It's a pretty good plotline, huh? I call it
'Space Jews.'"
Later, Chappelle talks about how some
African Americans owned and mistreated slaves. He calls these African Americans
"Space Jews."
"There was a Black man who was in
South Carolina during slavery who somehow got granted his freedom … Not only
was he a slave owner, he became a slave breeder, and employed tactics that were
so cruel, even white slave owners were like, "Yo, my man!" … How can
a person that went through slavery perpetuate the same evil on a person that
looks just like him? It's mind blowing. And, shockingly, they're making a movie
about him. Ironically, it's called "Space Jews."
The premise of Chappelle's joke is that
Jews are diabolically smart – they
achieve interstellar travel
Jews are alien
They are not like us
They come from far away
They dominate us
Jews claim to be victims of prejudice
but in fact Jews mistreat oppressed people
This is classic anti-Semitism.
So yeah it's grotesque to see "conservatives"
embracing and elevating Chappelle. He is bashing GLBT people, and they like
that. They can forgive his anti-white racism, his insistence that blacks are
doomed in America, and his anti-Semitism.
My book, "Bieganski,
the Brute Polak Stereotype," addresses stereotypes of Poles and other
Bohunks as stupid, brutal, anti-Semites. One chapter of the book is devoted to
a comparison between how the American popular press treats allegations of
anti-Semitism made against African Americans, and allegations of anti-Semitism
made against Poles. When a Pole makes an anti-Semitic statement, that event is
treated much more seriously by the mainstream American press. When an African
American makes an anti-Semitic statement, the American mainstream press
minimizes, excuses, and relativizes the statement.
Israel
Hayom begins its coverage with a very softball comment, "Dave Chapelle
may not really be an antisemite but his new Netflix special contains some very
antisemitic material … What Chapelle may think are harmless jokes…" The
article continues in this vein, repeatedly making excuses for Chappelle.
Why even make such a weak comment? What
kind of person makes anti-Semitic jokes? An anti-Semite. Call things as they
are. Dave Chappelle has associated with Louis Farrakhan, who delivered a popular sermon
alleging that "Hollywood" – read "Jews" and "homosexuals"
– tried to force Chappelle to wear women's clothing. If it looks like a duck,
and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, unless it's a popular African American
entertainer.
What would happen if a prominent Polish
person made the "space Jews" jokes? There would, quite literally, and
very quickly, be an international incident. Diplomatic relations would be
affected. There would be demands for apologies. There would be alarmed cries of
another holocaust. The comments section of Jewish online publications would be
full of outrage from Jews denouncing all Poles as irredeemable monsters. These
comments, and mainstream op-eds, would rewrite history. They would argue that
Poles have always been the "world's worst anti-Semites" and that no
Poles rescued Jews and that the Poles and the Nazis were allies. Etc etc etc.
We know this because this has happened before. Read "Bieganski." Read
this blog. It's all documented.
Again, I have no tribe. I have ethics.
Anti-Semitism is wrong. No matter who the anti-Semite is. And anti-Semitism is
the problem, not ethnicity. I wish more people felt the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Bieganski the Blog exists to further explore the themes of the book Bieganski the Brute Polak Stereotype, Its Role in Polish-Jewish Relations and American Popular Culture.
These themes include the false and damaging stereotype of Poles as brutes who are uniquely hateful and responsible for atrocity, and this stereotype's use in distorting WW II history and all accounts of atrocity.
This blog welcomes comments from readers that address those themes. Off-topic and anti-Semitic posts are likely to be deleted.
Your comment is more likely to be posted if:
Your comment includes a real first and last name.
Your comment uses Standard English spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Your comment uses I-statements rather than You-statements.
Your comment states a position based on facts, rather than on ad hominem material.
Your comment includes readily verifiable factual material, rather than speculation that veers wildly away from established facts.
T'he full meaning of your comment is clear to the comment moderator the first time he or she glances over it.
You comment is less likely to be posted if:
You do not include a first and last name.
Your comment is not in Standard English, with enough errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar to make the comment's meaning difficult to discern.
Your comment includes ad hominem statements, or You-statements.
You have previously posted, or attempted to post, in an inappropriate manner.
You keep repeating the same things over and over and over again.