The riots and looting in the US included vandalism directed at Jewish synagogues and grocery stores, and the Kosciuszko monument in DC. Those fomenting the riots engaged in class-based contempt for poor whites. I include this essay for that reason.
On May 25, 2020, white
police officer Derek Chauvin was video-recorded while arresting African
American man George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mahmod Abumayaleh, owner
of the Cup Foods delicatessen, reported that Floyd had paid his delicatessen
bill with a counterfeit twenty. "It was an obvious fake. The ink was still
running," reported
one observer.
In a video, Floyd is
handcuffed and face down on the road. Chauvin kneels on Floyd's neck for
several minutes, including almost three minutes after Floyd apparently lost
consciousness. The three other arresting officers were Thomas K. Lane, Tou
Thao, and J. Alexander Kueng. Kueng held Floyd's back. Lane held his legs. Thao
looked on. Kueng and Thao appear to be Asian-American. The police summoned an
ambulance, and an unresponsive Floyd was taken to a hospital, where he was
pronounced dead.
The four officers were
fired the next day. Chauvin was charged with third degree manslaughter and
murder on May 29. The other officers will probably be charged as well. Once
protests broke out, police
officers in many locations participated in protests against excessive use
of force by police.
American call-in shows,
comment sites, and politicians' comments, on the left and the right, rang with
condemnation. David Donovan's
Facebook page was typical. Donovan, and many of his Facebook friends, are
former Marines and law enforcement officers. He posted, "As a United
States Marine and former sheriff's deputy, it has given me great hope to see so
many of my friends from both the military and LEO communities stand firm in
their condemnation of the murder of George Floyd. Our job is to protect folks. Once
a suspect is in custody, his safety and well-being become our job. We have
voiced rapid, unanimous condemnation of this terrible act."
Many
conservatives, including Senator Ted Cruz, Jeanine Pirro, and Rush Limbaugh
condemned Chauvin's actions. Mark Levin, a Reagan-administration veteran,
bestselling author and talk show host, called the killing "murder." On
May 28, 2020, notoriously tough-on-crime former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former
Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik condemned Chauvin's actions on WABC, a
right-wing radio talk station, one of the nation's oldest and largest.
That Americans across
the board condemned Chauvin, wanted to see him tried, and called for change
meant nothing to thousands of agitators. Floyd's death was followed by days of
violent, deadly rioting and looting, in the US and abroad.
Folks who rarely take
to Facebook stampeded to keyboards, stood tiptoe on virtual boxes, pounded their
chests, and typed in all caps. Many rich, white, liberal posters on social
media joined, in a virtual sense, in the rioting and looting. By the "rich"
in "rich, white liberal" I don't mean Jeff-Bezos-level money. I mean
people who choose to live in mostly-white, bourgeois enclaves, people who have
never lived in a majority-minority inner city, who have never been left exposed
and vulnerable by an absent or hamstrung local police force, who have never had
to take public transportation ten miles from their home to buy groceries,
because, after the riots of the 1960s, all the local grocery stores packed up
and left, whose school-age children can get summer jobs, because there are
still local businesses, people who don't have to pay extortionate rates for car
and homeowner insurance. These are comfortable people who own, inherit, and
bequeath property, and want to retain the rights they exercise under a
capitalist system protected by the police and the military. A quote often attributed to
George Orwell: "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night because
rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Rich, white
liberals are rich because they can sleep peaceably in their beds at night. They
are insulated from the consequences of their own, pro-violence, anti-white,
anti-Western Civilization rhetoric.
By "white" I
mean majority, but not exclusively, white. As mentioned below, Cornel West,
given his biography, qualifies as a rich, white liberal. Unlike my rich, white
liberal Facebook friends, I know black people in real life, and those black
people hold diverse views. I know black people who condemn rioting. These black
people are willing openly to state difficult, critical truths that defy rich,
white liberal nostrums. Rich, white liberals don't state difficult truths; they
are too intoxicated by their Messiah complex, a leftist white man's burden,
that real black people rarely fall prey to. And real black people, as opposed
to those inhabiting RWL fantasies, are quite capable of criticizing rich, white
liberals, as an unnamed but powerful young black woman is able to do in
a video. She screams at white rioters for spray-painting local businesses
and setting fire to garbage cans on her street. "You are here profiting
off of our pain," she screams at white rioters, who can only stand and
film her, too intimidated to answer back. Real black people include Walter E.
Williams, who is quite capable of skewering and deflating RWL's savior complex,
as in his "Proclamation
of Amnesty and Pardon Granted to All Persons of European Descent."
In using the word "liberal,"
I am not referring to leftists. I'm not referring to people who read Marx, or
even have a clear idea of who Marx is. I'm not referring to people who wear Che
t-shirts or talk of revolution. I'm referring to Facebook users who are content
to vote Democratic, and not for Bernie Sanders, whom they regard as too extreme.
They're often suburbanites who might not consider themselves particularly
political. These nice, conventional, law-abiding, sometimes church-going
people, unthinkingly parrot a thorough hatred of Western Civilization, a
conviction that there is some vague something else out there that is better
than Western Civilization, a something else they are content to access through
visits to New Age bookstores, referring to God as "she," experiments
in exotic cuisines, or by saying "Namaste" and "karma."
These nice people were
cheering on the riots, even
as small businesses were looted and ruined, even
as CVS closed pharmacies in twenty states, pharmacies that no doubt many black
people rely on for prescriptions, even as a Rochester, New
York, woman, attempting to stop looters, was beaten with punches to the face
and boards over the head, even as a Dallas
man was beaten and stoned in the street, his attackers believing that they
had killed him, even as three Bronx rioters beat
a downed officer with a garbage can, even as the Kentucky
National Guard was fired upon, returned fire, and killed a man, even as
America, already laid low by a pandemic, was fraying at the edges.
The anti-civilizational
aspect of the riots is evident from its targets. The
Lincoln Memorial, The World War II Memorial, and Saint
Patrick's Cathedral were all vandalized. Synagogues
on the east and west coast were attacked. In a Kristallnacht touch, rioters
threw a rock through a synagogue window. Rioters spray-painted a pig and
obscenities on a monument to Tadeusz Kosciuszko. Kosciuszko was born in a
colonized nation, Poland, he fought to liberate. He also designed West Point, fought
for America's freedom, and he tried to convince Jefferson that slavery was a
bad idea. He emancipated his own peasants, held under the slavery-like yoke of
serfdom, and left money in his will to liberate American slaves.
Even after the
blood-letting began, my RWL Facebook friends were insisting that the riots were
not just justified, but cleansing, sanctified, and necessary for the creation
of a brave, new world, for the transition to that vague something better out
there, that something so much better than terminally tainted, distastefully
white, hideously Western, America. Their rhetoric mirrored rhetoric I was
seeing in the New York Times and hearing on National Public Radio. The
main points of this rhetoric are summarized, below.
The proper response is
not to attribute Floyd's death to the officers, two of whom were
Asian-American, who arrested Floyd and pinned him down. Derek Chauvin is, at
best, incidental to RWL narrative. His arrest should placate no one; that
arrest is no more than a footnote. Derek Chauvin isn't responsible; America,
and, by extension, all white people, are guilty of George Floyd's murder, and
every white American must be punished. Every white American has blood on his or
her hands. George Floyd's death proves that America is a white supremacist
wasteland, where all whites are all-powerful, violent racists and all blacks
are helpless victims with no power to resist, other than rioting and looting. "A
riot is the language of the unheard," RWLs insisted.
I asked how African
Americans could be unheard, in a country where African Americans are, and have
been for decades, represented at every level of power, from the presidency to
the cabinet to the judiciary to the legislature to the media, where African
Americans occupy outsize positions in culture, from Oprah Winfrey to Beyoncé to
Nobel-Prize-winner Toni Morrison, from the Tuskegee Airmen to Harriet Tubman to
LeBron James to Langston Hughes to Aretha Franklin to Maya Angelou to Neil
deGrasse Tyson to … too many other luminaries to mention, where museums, like
the National Museum of African American
History and Culture, receive millions of taxpayer dollars to research and
recount the history of African Americans, where required curricula at every
level of public and private education focus on African Americans, where the
entire music industry, and elements
of the broader culture, shut
down in protest of George Floyd's death. We are all taught to focus on
black victims of hate crimes, but we are not taught to remember victims who are
not black. I know few who recognize the names Leo Frank, Sherry Michelle Ansley,
or Yankel Rosenbaum, or have heard anything about the Lattimer or the Ludlow
Massacres. I received no reply to my question about how black people are
"unheard." I am still wondering what reply might be offered.
I was told that looting
and rioting are not just justified, they are sanctified; they are holy rituals
of purgation. One Facebook poster, Susan Carroll, a pretty white redhead, whose
Facebook cover image is a red, black and green "Black Lives Matter"
flag, analogized
Americans whose property was destroyed during riots to Nazis. Americans =
Nazis; rioting and looting Americans = American GIs storming Normandy Beach. That's
a rhetorical mobius strip.
Blonde, smiling,
Facebook poster Brittany
Spinks describes herself as an "entrepreneur, dog mom, and awesome
wife." Spinks lives in 84% white Galesburg, Illinois. She is one of many
Facebook users who justified her support for riots with a frequently-shared meme
that distorted facts to depict whites universally as killers and blacks, again,
without exception, as powerless victims. She wrote, "These riots will soon
end and those business owners will collect insurance and rebuild. The white
people get to go back to their normal lives."
Spinks is mistaken.
Studies consistently show that cities devasted by riots do not get back to
normal. "In the 1960s many American cities experienced violent,
race-related civil disturbances. This article examines census data from 1950 to
1980 to measure the riots' impact on the value of central-city residential
property, and especially on black-owned property … Estimates indicate that the
riots depressed the median value of black-owned property between 1960 and 1970,
with little or no rebound." So
wrote scholar William J. Collins, in just one of many studies investigating
the long-term effects of riots on community prosperity.
Echoes of this rhetoric
appeared across all media. White women are "instruments of terror"
who "knowingly" conspire to lynch black men, wrote Charles
M. Blow in the New York Times. The Times also published an
op-ed arguing that the riots were justified because "the
state is failing black people."
On
NPR's All Things Considered, Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, assistant
professor of African-American Studies at Princeton University, justified the
riots. "I think that riots, rebellions, uprisings are visceral expressions
of rage and frustration. And what we have to do is understand why it's
happening and do something about the conditions that led to its eruption … People
are on the streets, and they're angry, and they have a right to be angry … What
are we going to do about the conditions that create this level of rage? We're
not all just going to lay down and die and accept this kind of meager existence
that is being hoisted (sic) upon us."
WNYC's "On the
Media" broadcast Apryl
Williams, a communications and media professor at the University of
Michigan and a research fellow at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and
Society at Harvard University, who insisted that white women are racists who habitually
file false reports on black men and thereby destroy their lives. Every black
man is Emmet Till, a 14-year-old boy lynched in 1955 Mississippi . Every white
woman is Carolyn Bryant, the store clerk who alleged that Emmet Till got fresh
with her. Every day in America is the Jim Crow era. Every place is cotton-belt
Mississippi. There was never any Underground Railroad, any Ben Franklin, who
founded the Pennsylvania Abolition Society before there was a United States, or
John Adams, who damaged himself economically by refusing to own slaves and who
wrote anti-slavery language into the Massachusetts Constitution; there was never
any Harriet Beecher Stowe or John Brown. The sentence "All men are created
equal," and the ideas behind it, though written by a slave-holder, a
sentence that would go on to inspire the Civil War and the Civil Rights
Movement, was never written. Whites who gave their lives for black liberation,
like Viola Liuzzo, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner and the soldiers who
fought to end slavery, never lived, risked, fought, sacrificed, and died for
others' freedom.
In the L.A. Times, Kareem
Abdul-Jabbar, an idolized sports legend, film star, recipient of the
Presidential Medal of Freedom, with an estimated personal net worth of twenty
million dollars, insisted that rioters burning buildings were justified by
America's pervasive racism. "African Americans have been living in a
burning building for many years, choking on the smoke as the flames burn closer
and closer. Racism in America is like dust in the air. It seems invisible —
even if you're choking on it — until you let the sun in. Then you see it's
everywhere. As long as we keep shining that light, we have a chance of cleaning
it wherever it lands. But we have to stay vigilant, because it's always still
in the air."
Lady Gaga, a
college drop-out pop star whose Malibu house is worth twenty-two million
dollars, said on Instagram that rioters' anger was justified by "systemic
racism and corrupt systems" and the "silencing" of "black
voices" who are shown "no compassion." "Everyday people in
America are racist, that's a fact."
Billie
Eilish reached to the depths of her accumulated 18-year-old pop singer
wisdom and posted a lengthy, all-caps, obscenity-laced, anti-white rant. Whites
are as stupid as "children," whites are "motherf---ers."
Whites "are not in need. Are not in danger." Rather, "Black
people are killed just for being black." "Why are white people given
opportunities that people of other races aren't? Society clearly thinks black
lives don't f---ing matter! And they f---ing do!" White people should just
"SHUT THE F–K UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUP." Eilish appears not to realize
that she and her 64 million followers, are, indeed, "society" to whom
black lives "f---ing do" matter.
George Clooney, no
doubt, has devoted as much time to plumbing the depths of race relations as is
required of a man who has been a member of a show business dynasty all his life
and has been cashing in on his good looks as a professional actor since he was
17. Clooney
announced that "The anger and the frustration we see playing out once
again in our streets is just a reminder of how little we've grown as a country
from our original sin of slavery. The fact that we aren't actually buying and
selling other human beings anymore is not a badge of honor." White
supremacy "infects all of us, and in 400 years we've yet to find a
vaccine."
Though black, Cornel
West might be culturally classified as a rich, white liberal. He has lived his
entire life held aloft on the power of supremely potent American institutions,
like the Defense Department, insulated from the petty, daily agonies,
humiliations, frustrations and deferred dreams of the poor, black and white.
West has nothing in common with my mother, an immigrant cleaning woman forced
by her father's coal-mine induced emphysema to quit school and clean houses to
support her entire family, or my father, a child coal miner, and adult manual
laborer and golf caddy. West used the privilege America bestowed upon him, a
privilege no one in my family has ever known, to erect an edifice that insists
that my mother, my father, and I all enjoy "white privilege," even as
we clean our betters' homes, and carry their bags.
West's mother was a
school principal; the Irene B. West Elementary School, in Elk Grove,
California, is named for her. His father was a contractor with the defense
department. West graduated from Harvard and Princeton and has taught at
Harvard, Princeton, and Yale. He is one of the most
richly paid professors in America. His mother described his childhood city.
"The
kids and parents were just wonderful. I never encountered any racial prejudice."
West has made a very
comfortable career delivering statements like, "America is really a
chamber of horrors." During the rioting and looting, West
was sure to announce that the America that had been so good to him deserved
every lick of every flame, every shard of broken glass. America is a "predatory
capitalist civilization obsessed with money, money, money … There is a
connection between the seeds that you sow of violence externally and
internally."
That America is a
hellhole that can do nothing but harm innocent blacks has percolated down from
privileged elites like West to the man on the street. The Daily
News quoted a young black man looting a Manhattan skateboard
shop. After refusing to give his name, he "rushed out of the store with
his arms full of hoodies, designer sportswear and skateboards. 'They've been
beating my ass for four hundred years. Now I'm going to buy my own chains. They
call me black. Black America.'"
The meme
that Brittany Spinks and thousands of others shared made clear: every time a
black person dies, whiteness is responsible. Trayvon Martin, who was killed in
a fight with George Zimmerman, a man whose very features announce African and
Peruvian Native American ancestry, was a victim of whiteness. Though three
black officers were charged in the death of Freddie Grey, Grey was a victim of
whiteness. Officer Peter Liang accidentally shot Akai Gurley. Liang was born in
Hong Kong and is Chinese-American. Whiteness is to blame here, too. Sergeant
Kizzy Adonis supervised the arrest of Eric Garner, who died in custody. This
African American woman is not to be blamed; whiteness is to blame for Garner's
death. Corey Jones was shot by Nouman Raja, a Muslim of Pakistani ancestry –
but whiteness really pulled the trigger. Philando Castile was shot by Jeronimo
Yanez, whose name and appearance suggest mestizo ancestry; nevertheless, as one
website would have it, Officer Yanez "proves
white privilege exists and protects white cops."
The Facebook meme listing
a series of names doesn't just insist that black people who are killed are
always killed because of whiteness, regardless of the identity of their killer.
It also insists that all black people who are killed are engaging in obviously
non-threatening behavior at the time of their deaths. The meme begins, "I
have privilege as a white person because I can do all these things without
thinking twice." One of the things white people can do without being shot
to death: "I can play cops and robbers." The black person shot to
death for "playing cops and robbers," the meme informs, is Tamir
Rice. As video shows,
Tamir Rice stood on the street in his mostly black neighborhood and pointed a
gun at people. Pointing a gun at passersby is not "playing cops and robbers."
No one wanted Tamir Rice to die that day, and no one celebrates his killing,
but to insist that pointing a gun at strangers is a neutral behavior is beyond
absurd and exemplifies the desperate hate-mongering of those who want to blame
whiteness for every bad thing that happens in the world.
Another feature of the
social media discussion of Floyd's death was its religious fervor. The attitude
was not, "Let's present our set of facts and discuss till we reach a
consensus." Rather, anti-white rhetoric was laid down with the emotions
and fanatical intransigence of religious dogma that must be upheld at any cost.
Any discussion was dismissed, not as uninformed or unsupported, but rather as
leprous – both disgusting and evil – and worthy only of communal stoning. The
RWLs gesticulating histrionically in this fashion were, as I knew in some
cases, atheists who had abjured all religion, and indeed mocked religion. They
were also people who often mocked expertise, authority, obedience, and
conformity. Suddenly they were all popes, laying down dogma, demanding and
exhibiting rigid conformity and announcing themselves as absolute authorities.
Clearly, being a RWL was their religion, and any lack of deference to that
religion was heresy, and set the heretic up not to be politely debated, but to
be anathematized, bound and burned at the stake – or at the riot.
The terms "white
privilege," "white fragility" and "white supremacy"
served as a shorthand to encapsulate the unique, inherent evil of whiteness.
Anyone who rejected being told he or she had "white privilege" and
was a subconscious "white supremacist" was objecting because he or
she suffered from "white fragility." To be white is to be tainted.
The very word "white" was used to insult, denigrate, and
self-flagellate. As it happens, the term "white privilege" was
invented by a
very wealthy white woman, a classic rich, white liberal, who has slim to no
history of doing anything for black people or for black-white relations.
One poster, who lives
in an 86% white city with a 1% African American population, justified the riots
with reference to conversations she reported having with black friends. "I
just had a discussion about this on my page. I think I can now understand the
logic that says outrage is the proper response to the injustice. And the best
way to express outrage is through physical acts like riots and fires and
looting," she wrote. "There have been more than 4000 arrests made of
protestors for allegedly looting, vandalism, arson etc. … Should these arrests
have been made? Should these actions be called something less negative like
removing merchandise or building-rearrangement to reflect that they were
actions that stemmed from righteous anger and not the desire to be destructive?
… In talking with those who know better than I, I have been informed that these
actions and protests around the nation are logical and needed and perhaps even
moral because peaceful protests have not worked. Like those who rose up
violently in 1776, these actions are needed to get the attention of those in
power. They are actions rooted in free speech and as such are not criminal but
a cry of pain. Police or legal action against the protestors is fundamentally
wrong. You don't punish someone for acting out of pain and anger … I have
called out so many times by blacks for my white privilege, I had to conclude
that for some segments of our society, violent protests are both inevitable and
righteous. Since I cannot even claim to understand I just have to accept that
my thoughts were in error." She asked a black friend how many lootings of whites
should be allowed before enough had occurred to right wrongs. "One thing I
don't yet understand is how long this kind of action should be accepted. And is
it only within the context of a mass movement? What if six months from now an
individual breaks into a store, robs it and sets it on fire and says he is
doing it in protest of systemic racism, what leeway should be given him?"
I attempted to address
some of the above points in Facebook posts. No, I said, it is simply not true
that only blacks are ever killed, and that only whites do the killing, or that
rioting is inevitable after disturbing video is released, or that rioting is
inevitable because of "systemic" abuse. Statistics suggest that in
the US, a white
person is more likely to be a victim of a violent crime committed by a black
person than vice versa. Also, there is much study devoted to, and much
debate about, whether white cops are, in fact, committing a disproportionate
amount of killings of black, as opposed to white, suspects. See the work of Heather MacDonald, Roland
G. Fryer, and David
J. Johnson. Again, every decent person
condemns the killing of George Floyd. The question is not, Was this killing
justified? but rather, Does whiteness-as-demon really offer the best
explanatory power? Should we not be talking about what a difficult job policing
is, and what pushes any officer, black or white, over the edge?
Not just cold, dry,
inaccessible statistics, but immediate, heart-rending YouTube videos, throw a
monkey wrench into the "whiteness as demon" explanation. There are
highly disturbing videos of white police officers ending the lives of white
people. See, for example, the 2016 death of Daniel Shaver, a white man killed
by a white police officer. Warning: this video is highly
disturbing. No one rioted over Shaver's death.
See, also, the highly disturbing video
of white Tony Timpa's death at the hands of white and black Dallas police
officers in 2016. No one rioted over Tony Timpa's death.
See the disturbing video of the
aftermath of Somali-American Officer Mohamed Noor's shooting of Justine
Ruszczyk. Noor shot Ruszczyk to death for no discernable reason in 2017. A
white police officer attempts to protect Noor from implicating himself. No one
rioted over the Ruszczyk shooting.
That blacks as well as
whites can go over the edge was exemplified during the riots. In Atlanta,
two black police officers were fired for using excessive force. As I write
this, the most popular comments under the above-linked article at Yahoo are
supportive of the black police officers. Commenters don't care that the
officers are black. They care that the officers were trying to uphold the law
during a riot, and had an interaction with suspects who, as video shows, were fleeing
from police. One top post says,
"These two
officers need to sue the city of Atlanta. The mayor sends them into a riot and
expects them not to use force? Officers all over the country are having anything
and everything thrown at them and they are to do what exactly? These two
officers did their job and got fired. Blue flu for a couple days is what the
Atlanta police need. Let the mayor and her pc staff deal with rioters and see
how that works. The streets are very different from a boardroom."
If America were indeed
the white supremacist hellhole that wealth-and-celebrity-cocooned Clooney,
Eilish, Gaga, West, and Abdul-Jabbar want it to be, hundreds of Yahoo readers
would not be upvoting support for two black cops who used force in an attempt
to quell a riot.
On December 28, 2019, a
black man stabbed Jews at a Hanukah party in Monsey, New York. That man will
not go to trial. On December 10, 2019, a black couple carried out a terrorist
attack on a Jewish grocer in Jersey City, New Jersey. The couple had bombs "with
a range of up to five football fields" and had planned a larger
attack. These attacks occurred against the background of many violent attacks
on Jews by blacks, many
of them filmed. YouTube videos show African Americans kicking Jewish women
with strollers, defacing synagogues, and chasing and punching Jewish men
without any provocation at all. No Jews rioted or looted in response to these
deadly attacks.
On Facebook, I posted
the photos of Tessa Majors, an 18-year-old college student who was stabbed to
death by black 13-and-14-year-old boys in Morningside Park in 2019; Mindy
Ferencz, a 31-year-old grocer killed by black, antisemitic terrorists in
December, 2019; Samantha Josephson, a 21-year-old college student who was
trapped in a car she entered accidentally, and murdered, with sharp blows to
the head, by the car's black driver; and Justine Ruszczyk, shot to death, with
no provocation, by a black police officer in July, 2017. No one rioted over any
of these agonizing killings. They did not appear in my RWL Facebook friends'
feeds at all. It was as if they had never happened.
It's not just that
nobody rioted. Another difference is more important. In response to disturbing
YouTube videos of blacks randomly attacking Jews, in response to black killings
of Jews, in response to the shocking killings of the above-listed four women,
no responsible person insisted that blackness was responsible for evil. No one
said that black culture needed to be overturned. In contrast, of course, RWLs
and their allies demonize whiteness, and attribute killing to white identity.
This difference is profound. Conflating an identity with atrocity cultivates
hatred and provides justification for hate-based abuse, as we are witnessing in
riots and looting.
There's another problem
with conflating white identity with "white privilege" and
criminality, as did Charles M. Blow and Apryl Williams. In response to Blow's
piece, I submitted this comment to the New York Times. "Four of my
white acquaintances, that I know of, have been raped by black men. One was
young, naive, an Ivy League grad, and thin as a rail. She was teaching, as part
of a volunteer program, in a bad neighborhood. The rapist broke in at night.
The administrators of the program for which she volunteered were not
supportive. One was, again, young, naive, and in love with African diaspora
culture. She was raped by her mentor on campus. One was a child. Her wealthy
parents were activists who supported the Black Panthers. The rape happened in
her childhood home. Her parents were not supportive. One was a survivor of
previous sexual assault. She became morbidly obese, and was trying to get her
life back together by becoming physically fit. She was raped on a jogging track
early in the morning. The police never found the rapist. I knew these women
over the course of decades, in different towns and cities. One thing they all
had in common – they discussed their rapes rarely, briefly, and in whispers,
and they expected no sympathy. They knew the stereotypes of white women as
Southern Belles who make false accusations that result in a lynching. This was
not they, though. None were from the South. None were belles. They were victims
of racist, misogynist, violent crimes."
The New York Times declined
to publish my comment. Empowered voices like Charles M. Blow and Apryl Williams
silence real suffering, and distort national conversations. Influencer Billie
Eilish who has, no doubt, struggled through famines and holocausts in her 18
years, insists to her influencees that whites have not suffered and that
therefore whites must be silenced. She contributes to the silent shame felt by
my friends who have survived politically incorrect rapes.
Everyone hates someone
else in America right now. Why, with so many potential targets, am I raging at
RWLs who have done nothing but speak?
I rage at RWLs because,
as much as I may love them as individuals, I believe that their Facebook
posturing is utterly phony. It is Darwinian. They have created an atmosphere
where they gain social status by declaring that whiteness is evil. But they
themselves are white. They distance themselves from the evil they identify with
whiteness by emphatically distancing themselves from the whiteness they have
stigmatized. Billie Eilish is no humanitarian and no outlaw. She is as crafty a
practitioner of tooth-and-claw survival-of-the-fittest as any viceroy butterfly
pretending to be a monarch. "Yeah, whiteness is bad, but it's the other
whiteys you want, not me."
Inevitably, rich white liberals
implicate poor whites. Poor whites are less comfortable accepting that they are
recipients of white privilege, so poor whites will always be the scapegoat of
RWL kabuki productions.
The Billie Eilishes and
George Clooneys and my rich, white liberals Facebook friends are not acting out
of love of black people. They're acting out of hate for their own whiteness.
Blacks are surrogates. They urge blacks do act out in ways that RWLs dream of
doing, but wouldn't dare to do. RWLs want their black surrogates to be
gangstas. When I was in grad school, I had a shy, gentle black girlfriend. She
told me that white men dated her because they wanted to have a fling with
Sheena, queen of the jungle, but that's just not who she was. RWLs may dream of
rioting against the restraints in their own lives, but lack the courage to
throw that Molotov cocktail. They deputize blacks to do it for them, but then
walk away from the scene of carnage.
Scholar Orlando
Patterson has written of this. The gangsta pose "brought [black
youths] a great deal of respect from white youths … young black men and women
tend to have the highest levels of self-esteem of all ethnic groups, and their
self-image is independent of how badly they do in school. I call this the
Dionysian trap for young black men. The subculture that ensnares them … has
powerful support from some of America's largest corporations. Hip-hop,
professional basketball and homeboy fashions are as American as cherry pie.
Young white Americans are very much into these things, but selectively; they
know when it is time to turn off Fifty Cent and get out the SAT prep book."
Young white Americans drop their gangsta surrogates when it is time to "act
white." Whites applauding blacks for the gangsta act "is a major
factor in [black youths'] disconnection from the socioeconomic mainstream."
If RWLs loved black
people, they would not be cheering riots on from afar. They would be tutoring,
mentoring, sweeping up broken glass. They would be reading Shelby Steele, Jason
Riley, Walter E. Williams, Thomas Sowell, Orlando Patterson, and other black
conservative authors they've never heard of. They would speak difficult truths
about race relations, and that is the acid test. No one unwilling publicly to
speak difficult truths has any authority on this topic.
RWLs are not just, at
their core, indifferent to the welfare of blacks, and they are not just
exploitative of black people's suffering, as the above-linked black woman
haranguing white rioters makes clear.
RWLs hurt black people.
All those "nice," liberal bourgeois Americans who see themselves as
exemplars of compassionate post-Christian Madonnas, bleeding healing love from
their sacred hearts, have killed more black people than Derek Chauvin.
America wants to give
African Americans so much. There are millions of dollars earmarked for African
Americans. Not for Native Americans, or poor whites, or the blind, or cancer survivors.
Yes, those groups get money, too, but I'm talking about money specifically
earmarked for African Americans exclusively. There are scholarships, jobs,
programs, waiting for someone to walk in the door, or fill out a form, or pass
a class.
RWLs insist that
African Americans must go through their lives with their eyes on the ground and
their arms over their heads, awaiting some evil white man's fatal blow. RWLs
insist that they, and only they, and their anti-American, anti-white ideology
of pity and white rescue can help African Americans. Constantly attributing any
misfortune, from cloudy weather to a facial pimple to white supremacy. RWLs
thus hobble young black lives.
Black conservative
authors like Shelby Steele offer a different route to success in America for
African Americans. I can't even discuss Steele with RWLs because they have
never heard of him and see no reason to read him. They are the saviors, and
black people must suffer in silence till they reach every last one. How? By
bashing whiteness on Facebook.
This weird mess of RWL
feelings for black people is summed up in a photo from the recent riots. A
white woman gives the finger to a police officer, who happens to be black.
No doubt she thinks he is an Uncle Tom. No doubt he thinks, with reason, that
she is simply nuts.
Danusha Goska is the
author of God
through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery
No comments:
Post a Comment
Bieganski the Blog exists to further explore the themes of the book Bieganski the Brute Polak Stereotype, Its Role in Polish-Jewish Relations and American Popular Culture.
These themes include the false and damaging stereotype of Poles as brutes who are uniquely hateful and responsible for atrocity, and this stereotype's use in distorting WW II history and all accounts of atrocity.
This blog welcomes comments from readers that address those themes. Off-topic and anti-Semitic posts are likely to be deleted.
Your comment is more likely to be posted if:
Your comment includes a real first and last name.
Your comment uses Standard English spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Your comment uses I-statements rather than You-statements.
Your comment states a position based on facts, rather than on ad hominem material.
Your comment includes readily verifiable factual material, rather than speculation that veers wildly away from established facts.
T'he full meaning of your comment is clear to the comment moderator the first time he or she glances over it.
You comment is less likely to be posted if:
You do not include a first and last name.
Your comment is not in Standard English, with enough errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar to make the comment's meaning difficult to discern.
Your comment includes ad hominem statements, or You-statements.
You have previously posted, or attempted to post, in an inappropriate manner.
You keep repeating the same things over and over and over again.