The new law goes against Jewish interests. So what would we expect Harris to say?Again, everything said against this law can be turned around, and validly pinned on the long-existing laws that criminalize the denial of 6 million murdered Jews (Holocaust denial).So Jewish criticisms of this law seem, to me, like a lot of self-serving hypocrisy.
Jan Peczkis I'm really sick of reading your anti Jewish posts. I post them because I believe in freedom of speech but reading them makes me sick.
OK. Let's focus exclusively on the implications of the law.Polish Law Backfires? Then Long-Existing Laws Criminalizing the Questioning of 6 Million Jewish Deaths-Also Backfire! Thus:Which law are we talking about when we say that,1. It infringes on free speech.2. It is arbitrary and unenforceable. [If a yokel was overheard on the bus making the wisecrack, "The 6 million is a myth", could he or she be prosecuted?]3. It gives much more publicity to the objectionable speech than such speech could ever get otherwise. 4. The law is a solution looking for a problem.5. Truth does not need to be protected by laws.6. The best disinfectant for objectionable speech is sunshine.7. It makes a free-speech martyr and hero out of anyone actually criminalized.8. In the long run, it makes any nation having such laws look foolish. Etc.[See Michael Bazyler (Property-Restitution Attorney): Holocaust, Genocide, and the Law]
Bieganski the Blog exists to further explore the themes of the book Bieganski the Brute Polak Stereotype, Its Role in Polish-Jewish Relations and American Popular Culture. These themes include the false and damaging stereotype of Poles as brutes who are uniquely hateful and responsible for atrocity, and this stereotype's use in distorting WW II history and all accounts of atrocity. This blog welcomes comments from readers that address those themes. Off-topic and anti-Semitic posts are likely to be deleted. Your comment is more likely to be posted if: Your comment includes a real first and last name.Your comment uses Standard English spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Your comment uses I-statements rather than You-statements. Your comment states a position based on facts, rather than on ad hominem material. Your comment includes readily verifiable factual material, rather than speculation that veers wildly away from established facts. T'he full meaning of your comment is clear to the comment moderator the first time he or she glances over it. You comment is less likely to be posted if:You do not include a first and last name.Your comment is not in Standard English, with enough errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar to make the comment's meaning difficult to discern.Your comment includes ad hominem statements, or You-statements. You have previously posted, or attempted to post, in an inappropriate manner. You keep repeating the same things over and over and over again.