|
Piast. Michał Elwiro Andriolli Stara Basn |
Poland has had two Jewish kings.
According to legend.
The first was Abraham Prochownik. Prochownik means
"powder-maker."
In 842, according to one retelling, a Jewish man, Abraham
Prochownik, was invited to become the next king of an embryonic Poland. If he
turned this invitation down, it was implied, he would be put to death.
Prochownik regarded this invitation with hesitance, and made a speech arguing
for the coronation of Piast, peasant and wheelwright. Prochwnik's oratory was
so persuasive that Piast, indeed, became king, establishing a dynasty
Here's Gershon David Hundert describing the Prochownik
legend in his review of the 2001 Wayne State University book Jewish Poland: Legends of Origin.
Ethnopoetics and Legendary Chronicles by Haya bar-Itzhak.
"Several versions of the story of Abraham
Prochownik, the Jew who was offered the Polish crown, are compared in the third
chapter. Polish nobles, despairing because of their own feuding over how and
whom they would choose as king, finally resolved that the first person to enter
the town the next morning would be acclaimed as monarch. This turned out to be
the Jewish merchant/peddler, Abraham Prochownik. By a wise subterfuge, he leads
the noble-electors to acclaim Piast, ancestor of the first Polish dynasty, as
their king.
As Bar-Itzhak points out, this legend confers antiquity on
Jewish residence in Poland, legitimizes their commercial activities, glorifies
Polish Jews as responsible for the ascension of the famous Piast dynasty and
asserts that, even in 'the good old days,' they did not seek power for
themselves in the state.
Like most of the other tales, the earliest known
versions of this story date from the 19th century, and the story could be and
was used in the struggle for the expansion of Jewish rights. According to the
author, there is also in this legend a message directed to a Jewish audience. Judaism
recognizes a legitimate Jewish kingship only in the Land of Israel; accepting
dominion in an adopted country is tantamount to assimilation. The rejection of
the crown transmits a message that living in Poland does not mean relinquishing
Jewish identity – a message that was particularly relevant in the nineteenth
century."
Poland's other Jewish king was Saul Wahl. Here are
Isidore Singer and Julius Gottlieb retelling his legend in the 1906 Jewish
Encyclopedia
Saul Wahl was "a remarkable personage who, according
to tradition, occupied for a short time the throne of Poland. The story
connected with his reign is as follows: Prince Nicholas Radziwill, surnamed the
Black, who lived in the sixteenth century, desiring to do penance for the many
atrocities he had committed while a young man, undertook a pilgrimage to Rome
in order to consult the pope as to the best means for expiating his sins. The
pope advised him to dismiss all his servants and to lead for a few years the
life of a wandering beggar. After the expiration of the period prescribed,
Radziwill found himself destitute and penniless in the city of Padua, Italy.
His appeals for help were heeded by nobody, and his story
of being a prince was received with scorn and ridicule. He finally decided to
appeal to Samuel Judah Katzenellenbogen, the rabbi of Padua. The latter
received him with marked respect, treated him very kindly, and furnished him
with ample means for returning to his native country in a manner befitting his
high rank.
When the time for departure came the prince asked the
rabbi how he could repay him for his kindness. The rabbi then gave him a
picture of his son Saul, who years before had left for Poland, and asked the
prince to try and find the boy in one of the many yeshibot of that country. The
prince did not forget the request. Upon his return to Poland he visited every
yeshibah in the land, until finally he discovered Saul in that of
Brest-Litovsk. He was so captivated by the brilliancy and depth of Saul's intellect
that he took him to his own castle, provided for all his wants, and supplied
him with all possible means for study and investigation. The noblemen who
visited Radziwill's court marveled at the wisdom and learning of the young Jew,
and thus the fame of Saul spread throughout Poland.
When King Bathori died (1586) the people of Poland were
divided into two factions: the Zamaikis [sic] and the Zborowskis. There were
quite a number of candidates for the throne, but the contending parties could
agree upon no one. There existed at that time in Poland a law which stipulated
that the throne might not remain unoccupied for any length of time, and that in
case the electors could not agree upon a candidate an outsider should be
appointed 'rex pro tempore' (temporary king).
This honor was then offered to Radziwill; but he refused,
saying that there was a man who belonged to neither party, and who in wisdom
and goodness was far superior to any one else he knew. That man possessed only
one very slight shortcoming, and if the Diet would make his election unanimous,
he (Radziwill) would acquaint it with his name. Accordingly, Saul's name was
solemnly proposed; and amid great enthusiasm, and shouts of 'Long live King
Saul!' Wahl was elected to this high office. The name 'Wahl' was given him from
the German word 'wahl' (= 'election').
Traditions disagree as to the length of his reign. Some
state that he ruled one night only; others make it a few days. All, however,
are agreed that Saul succeeded in passing a number of very wise laws, and among
them some that tended to ameliorate the condition of the Jews in Poland.
Although this story cannot be supported by any historical data, it gained a
firm place in the belief of the people."
Haya bar-Itzhak's explanation of the Abraham Prochownik legend is interesting. The homeland of the Jews is Israel, but the legend attempts to establish a Jewish presence at the birth of Poland. Judaism puts a great deal of emphasis on the spiritual connection that Jews have with Israel, but this legend does something similar with Poland. The legend seems to argue that Jews had a stake of ownership in a land they admit is not their own. This combined with a fierce resistance to assimilation seems strange to me. It amounts to commitment to being a perpetual alien. This leads me to a question. Did Jews feel that this was in anyway a bad thing? I am not saying that I think assimilation means abandoning Judaism, just that arguing for a 'nation within a nation' doesn't seem like a very nice thing to do from the outside looking in.
ReplyDeleteChris Helinsky
Hi, Chris, i talk about these issues in Bieganski ...
Delete